Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mgravina
    Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 10

    Double-SPRI size selection

    We are attempting to automate double-SPRI size selection, in which two successive SPRI-bead-based size cuts are used to select DNA approximately between 200 and 450 bp in length. We are having a very hard time getting the reaction to work and would really appreciate some advice.

    Design:
    Our design adds Agencourt Ampure SPRI beads to the DNA at a volume ratio of 0.55, incubates and separates out the beads, then moves the supernatant from that binding reaction into a second reaction where the ratio is increased to 0.7. After the second incubation, we separate, rinse, and elute from the beads. The first reaction cuts out the material above 450 bp, and the second cuts out the material below 200 bp.

    At least in theory. In reality, the amount of size selection we get is minimal, on the order of maybe 10-20% reduction in the high and low bands.
    We have experimented heavily and modified the following factors:
    • Robotic vs manual pipetting
    • Different technicians
    • Different samples, including unselected DNA libraries and DNA ladders
    • Different lots of each reagent, including Ampure beads, ethanol and elution buffer
    • Different SPRI : DNA ratios for each cut point
    • Incubation periods at 5, 10, 15 minutes
    • Smaller and larger volumes
    • Different separation magnets


    None of these has improved size selection. We've exhausted our own ideas for what could be causing the problem. Has anyone encountered similar difficulties before, or is there an obvious factor here that we're missing?
  • Heisman
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 534

    #2
    What I did back in the day I was working on this was to make my own solution of PEG and NaCl and not use the bead solution. So, I'd put an aliquot of beads on a magnet, discard the entire supernatant, pour in my own PEG/NaCl mixture, and go from there. In theory it shouldn't make a difference but it worked for me. Something to consider trying.

    Comment

    • JeremyDay
      Registered Vendor
      • Feb 2012
      • 25

      #3
      Can you provide volumes of each reagent/sample?
      Vol Starting material=
      Vol Ampure added 1st sel=
      Volume of Ampure the supernatant is added to=

      Starting material is only DNA and H2O or TE, correct? If it is from a RXN, there could be PEG in the RXN. You wash 2x with 70/80% EtOH after second selection?

      I successfully use Ampure on Biomek FXP for lib prep and get consistent results, so I may be able to help. Heisman is correct that you dont actually need Ampure beads. In fact, you can make homemade beads and/or just the salt/peg solution. However, if Ampure is not working for you, neither will the solutions.

      Comment

      • JeremyDay
        Registered Vendor
        • Feb 2012
        • 25

        #4
        Also, what is the size of DNA for starting material? Genomic? Fragmented?

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.


          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
          by SEQadmin2


          Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


          The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
          ...
          06-02-2026, 10:05 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Single-Cell Sequencing at an Inflection Point: Early Impacts of New Platforms and Emerging Trends
          by SEQadmin2


          With the launch of new single-cell sequencing platforms in 2026, the field stands at an exciting inflection point. This article surveys the most impactful advances in the field and discusses how they’re reshaping research in cancer, immunology, and beyond.


          Introduction

          Single-cell sequencing technologies have undergone remarkable advances over the past decade, transitioning from low-throughput experimental approaches to highly scalable platforms capable of...
          05-22-2026, 06:42 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        24 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
        0 responses
        40 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
        0 responses
        47 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
        0 responses
        49 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...