Anyone tried to purify double strand circular DNA by AmPure XP??
Anyone tried to purify ~1kb double strand circular DNA by AmPure XP?
Unconfigured Ad
Collapse
X
-
good questions, it give me some help, thanks everyone in this question
Leave a comment:
-
When you say more effective, you mean the range of the DNA size, distribution or recovery?
Originally posted by cbird View PostWe've found SPRI Select is much more effective than Ampure XP for size selection also. Anybody know what the difference is? I seriously doubt it's the beads themselves...
Check out this paper. http://www.plosone.org/article/info%...l.pone.0010029
They use varying percentages of PEG and 0.9M NaCl, not 2.5M. They are also using MyOne CA Dynabeads
Leave a comment:
-
We've found SPRI Select is much more effective than Ampure XP for size selection also. Anybody know what the difference is? I seriously doubt it's the beads themselves...
Check out this paper. http://www.plosone.org/article/info%...l.pone.0010029
They use varying percentages of PEG and 0.9M NaCl, not 2.5M. They are also using MyOne CA Dynabeads
Leave a comment:
-
The bead is overdried and there is no DNA in the supernate.What should I do?
Leave a comment:
-
As mentioned earlier with Ampure XP, we were seeing inconsistent results. Our recent testing with SPRIselect has been going well and the data so far looks amazing! What seem to work best for us is 0.8X and 0.61 double SPRI. Peak at 300 +/- 100bp.
Leave a comment:
-
I heard there should be less lot to lot variation that you sometimes see when doing size selection with Ampure XP. So in other words, sounds like there is more QC that goes on for SPRISelect. Not sure if there are differences in buffer etc...
Leave a comment:
-
Anyone have any experience/thoughts on the new Agencourt product SPRISelect? Is it just higher quality beads of Ampure XP or is something new in the buffer to help with size specificity? All I see is a $50 more expensive product that is already over priced, but I digress....
Leave a comment:
-
15 cycles is still a lot. We have over amplified with less cycles and similar amounts of primer. It would depend on how much of the PCR input is competent. Have you run the samples on the Bioanalyser? Do you see an over amplification bubble?Originally posted by junorose View Posti uesed 25pmol primer,both universal and index primer, in theory, it should be plenty enough; last time i did this experiment, i first added 50ul water to 50ul pcr reaction, then perfromed Ampure XP clean up. i got as much as 55ng/ul *17ul DNA.
Leave a comment:
-
i uesed 25pmol primer,both universal and index primer, in theory, it should be plenty enough; last time i did this experiment, i first added 50ul water to 50ul pcr reaction, then perfromed Ampure XP clean up. i got as much as 55ng/ul *17ul DNA.Originally posted by TonyBrooks View PostI think it more likely that you've exhausted your primers during your PCR rather than bead saturation. 15 cycles is a quite a lot of amplification.
1µL of AmpureXP should contain enough beads to bind a few µg's of nucleic acid.
Leave a comment:
-
What kind of magnet are you using?Originally posted by ooriw View PostUsed AmpureXL on Zymmo purified samples (no salts or detergents), got reasonable yields but the beads did not align well to the tube side but rather settled to the bottom.
has anyone encountered this- what does it mean?
Leave a comment:
-
I think it more likely that you've exhausted your primers during your PCR rather than bead saturation. 15 cycles is a quite a lot of amplification.Originally posted by junorose View Posthi, i am using AmpureXP to perform DNA purification to library chip-seq DNA. i change the size selection ratio from 0.9*-0.2* to 0.8*-0.4*to get a wider size range. one problem i have confront is that no matter how much initiation DNA i use(from 10ng to 160ng), i always get an equal amount of DNA(~30ng/ul*17ul) after PCR amplification(15 cycles). i cannot explain this result, can it be due to DNA capacity of AmpureXP beads?
1µL of AmpureXP should contain enough beads to bind a few µg's of nucleic acid.
Leave a comment:
-
Ampure beads don't settle well
Used AmpureXL on Zymmo purified samples (no salts or detergents), got reasonable yields but the beads did not align well to the tube side but rather settled to the bottom.
has anyone encountered this- what does it mean?
Leave a comment:
-
anyone knows the DNA capacity of AmpureXP beads?
hi, i am using AmpureXP to perform DNA purification to library chip-seq DNA. i change the size selection ratio from 0.9*-0.2* to 0.8*-0.4*to get a wider size range. one problem i have confront is that no matter how much initiation DNA i use(from 10ng to 160ng), i always get an equal amount of DNA(~30ng/ul*17ul) after PCR amplification(15 cycles). i cannot explain this result, can it be due to DNA capacity of AmpureXP beads?Last edited by junorose; 12-27-2012, 06:26 PM.
Leave a comment:
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by SEQadmin2
Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?
Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating...-
Channel: Articles
10-14-2026, 09:55 AM -
-
by SEQadmin2
Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.
We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing...-
Channel: Articles
-
ad_right_rmr
Collapse
News
Collapse
| Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:13 AM
|
0 responses
19 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
Yesterday, 11:13 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:48 AM
|
0 responses
18 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
Yesterday, 10:48 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
|
0 responses
36 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
|
0 responses
42 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
|
Leave a comment: