Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ben_Niu
    Junior Member
    • Dec 2013
    • 6

    16SrDNA library QC

    Hi everyone,
    After the QC by qPCR with my 16SrDNA library, I got a concentration value 13.65nM. When I submitted the sample, it was measured as more than 40nM. The sample is planning to be sequenced by illumina. I don't know if the concentration variation is normal? Do you think the sample is good for illumina sequencing? I look forward to your suggestions.Thank you very much!
  • Genohub
    Registered Vendor
    • Mar 2013
    • 210

    #2
    Did you qc more than one sample? How did the other samples compare relative to each other? I've seen these differences before. Did both groups use the same qPCR standards, qPCR mix?

    - Genohub

    Comment

    • Ben_Niu
      Junior Member
      • Dec 2013
      • 6

      #3
      No, I only did one sample. The experiment was done by a facility, so I've no idea about the qPCR standards or mix. Did you use the samples with such differences for illumina sequencing? Did they work? Thank you!

      Comment

      • Genohub
        Registered Vendor
        • Mar 2013
        • 210

        #4
        Does the facility have a lot of experience with loading samples for sequencing? If yes, then you're probably okay. qPCR quantifies only amplifiable, competent adapter ligated library products. It's used to check cluster density and reduce variability between multiple libraries. My guess is that the qPCR standards or mix used was different. Does your prep have a lot of adapter dimers? If the facility has a lot of experience with NGS, they most likely have experience with cluster density and have optimized their qPCR prep to give them these numbers.

        - Genohub

        Comment

        • Ben_Niu
          Junior Member
          • Dec 2013
          • 6

          #5
          Thank you so much for the explanation! To avoid the misunderstanding, I want to clarify that 13.65nM is a value obtained with qPCR during QC. I got 40nM with a florescence probes kit before QC. Additionally, before qPCR the result from Tape Station looks good.

          Comment

          • Genohub
            Registered Vendor
            • Mar 2013
            • 210

            #6
            It's fairly common to see discrepancies between double strand specific fluorescent probes and qPCR. dsProbes will bind to anything that has double strands, while qPCR will be more picky and only measure products that can amplify. I haven't seen your Tape Station results but if you're getting a good size range, then it sounds like you're in good shape to sequence.

            - Genohub

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
              by SEQadmin2


              Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

              The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
              ...
              07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
              by SEQadmin2



              Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
              ...
              07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
              by SEQadmin2



              Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

              There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
              07-08-2026, 05:17 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 12:17 PM
            0 responses
            14 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-23-2026, 11:41 AM
            0 responses
            15 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-20-2026, 11:10 AM
            0 responses
            23 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
            0 responses
            37 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...