Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Sciurus
    Member
    • Dec 2013
    • 23

    #1

    Need help interpreting these weird Bioanalyzer results

    Hi everybody,

    Today, I extracted RNA from plant material, which I want to - eventually - sequence. For quality check I ran them on the Bioanalyzer as I have done several times with the same type of samples and always had good results (high RIN, nice peaks, etc.) but this time it came out very weird... Lots of smear in some, in others almost nothing.
    I attached the whole output pdf, so maybe - please - someone here knows if this is my samples or the Chip or whatever?

    Thanks already! :-)
    Attached Files
  • flobpf
    Member
    • Apr 2010
    • 76

    #2
    Looks like RNA fragmentation or DNA contamination to me. The peaks are well correlated with the gel. If it was the chip, you'd have seen it across all samples. You might want to run an agarose gel yourself to confirm fragmentation. Maybe the DNAse treatment step was not very efficient? Or you didn't completely inactivate RNAse...
    Last edited by flobpf; 01-29-2014, 08:04 AM. Reason: grammar

    Comment

    • Sciurus
      Member
      • Dec 2013
      • 23

      #3
      I didn't do DNA-free treatment yet. But I hadn't done before either when the results were good.
      I was suggested that the RNA hadn't completely resolved in the buffer. Can that be?

      Comment

      • flobpf
        Member
        • Apr 2010
        • 76

        #4
        Originally posted by Sciurus View Post
        I didn't do DNA-free treatment yet. But I hadn't done before either when the results were good.
        I was suggested that the RNA hadn't completely resolved in the buffer. Can that be?
        If that was the case, I think you'd see lighter bands and lower RNA yields. You wouldn't see new bands.

        Comment

        • Sciurus
          Member
          • Dec 2013
          • 23

          #5
          Originally posted by flobpf View Post
          If that was the case, I think you'd see lighter bands and lower RNA yields. You wouldn't see new bands.
          Okay, thanks! So, you'd say it's DNA contamination?

          Comment

          • flobpf
            Member
            • Apr 2010
            • 76

            #6
            or RNA fragmentation due to incomplete inactivation of RNAse from sample.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
              by SEQadmin2



              Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

              Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
              ...
              10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
              by SEQadmin2


              Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

              We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
              ...
              09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:52 AM
            0 responses
            9 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
            0 responses
            19 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-13-2026, 09:56 AM
            0 responses
            16 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
            0 responses
            27 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...