Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • rtei
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2010
    • 1

    RNA sample quality for 454 transcriptome sequencing

    Hello,

    we would like to prepare a cDNA Rapid Library from PolyA+ RNA but quality assesment (Agilent Bioanalyzer - attached pictures) showed most likely rRNA contamination. I was told it can interfere following RNA fragmentation so I should try to remove more rRNA from the sample or I can try if the fragmentation is succesful or not. Has anyone any experience with rRNA residue in the sample???

    Thank you very much!!!
    Attached Files
  • AKroxy
    Member
    • May 2009
    • 20

    #2
    I don't know if it can interfere, but you probably don't want the majority of your sequences to be from rRNA. If you have enough RNA, you can run it over Dynabeads mRNA purification kit one or two times to get rid of more of the rRNA.

    Comment

    • pmiguel
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2008
      • 2328

      #3
      Originally posted by rtei View Post
      Hello,

      we would like to prepare a cDNA Rapid Library from PolyA+ RNA but quality assesment (Agilent Bioanalyzer - attached pictures) showed most likely rRNA contamination. I was told it can interfere following RNA fragmentation so I should try to remove more rRNA from the sample or I can try if the fragmentation is succesful or not. Has anyone any experience with rRNA residue in the sample???

      Thank you very much!!!
      Yes, we always use 2 cycles of polyA+ purification to deplete total RNA of rRNA. With just 1 cycle our samples are generally still 10-30% rRNA.

      The downside is that it takes a long time and the yields are terrible! 0.5%, if we are lucky. More often 0.1% is more often what we get.

      I am wondering if we should do 1 cycle of riboMinus followed by 1 cycle of polyA+ because I am worried about about the amount of 3' bias caused by 2 rounds of polyA+ isolation with such poor yields.

      --
      Phillip

      Comment

      • shurjo
        Senior Member
        • Jan 2009
        • 132

        #4
        Looking at your BioAnalyzer traces, are you sure it is rRNA contamination and not degradation? Are you using a fresh tissue source?

        Also, I routinely use two rounds of DynaBeads purification and while there is some 3' bias for longer genes (>6Kb, approx), it is a tradeoff I would happily make over lost readspace because of rRNA. I believe from talking to people who use Ribominus+Dynabeads that the yield is really low, but if you have enough total RNA, it may work for you.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
          by SEQadmin2



          Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
          ...
          07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
          by SEQadmin2



          Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

          There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
          07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
        0 responses
        28 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
        0 responses
        37 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
        0 responses
        25 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
        0 responses
        35 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...