Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • samhh11
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2014
    • 2

    Whole cell lysate vs. nuclear lysate for ChIP-seq sample prep (sonication step).

    Hello everyone,
    I'm a newbie in ChIP-seq and I'm having trouble in sample prepartion, particularly sonication step. I use the Bioruptor.
    I'm just getting a huge smear when I run my sonicated samples in a gel.
    With numerous tries, I ruled out over-fixation, insufficient number of sonication cycles, tubes, etc.
    So the only possible factor that comes to my mind is the use of whole cell lysate.
    I know that general protocols make you isolate the nuclei and use the nuclear lysate for sonication.
    But I've been using the whole cell lysate including everything for sonication (using RIPA buffer for cell lysis).

    Does anyone know if this could result in incomplete sonication?
    I've been stuck at this step too long and I'm hoping to get some feedback to solve this
    Thanks!
  • HSV-1
    Member
    • Jul 2012
    • 38

    #2
    Hi,
    I had the same trouble for long but now I solved the problem.
    In short the whole cell lysate is no problem.
    You thought your samples were not sonicated well according to your Agarose electrophoresis. How did you purify your DNA? If precipitation with glycogen I think you will always get a huge smear!
    To make sure your sonication is no problem you could directly load your sonicated chromatin (yes, w/o reverse crosslink , w/0 spinning down, lets say 5ul) on a 2% Agarose. You might realize that the band will be higher than the sonicated DNA. But don't worry they are very similar. If you want to see sonicated DNA quality you should purify DNA with Qiagen PCR purification column post reverse crosslink.
    Do you use the steel probe to do sonication? If yes, make sure the volume is around 2ml. 12-15min will make good sonication for many cell lines


    Cheers,


    Good luck!

    Comment

    • samhh11
      Junior Member
      • Jul 2014
      • 2

      #3
      Hi HSV-1,
      Thank you so much for your reply.
      I've been using glycogen to aid precipitation, so I guess that might have caused the huge smear!
      I use bath sonicator, the Diagenode Bioruptor.
      When you use Qiaquick PCR purification column, do you follow their PCR purification protocol? (such as adding PB buffer 5 times the volume of your sample before loading to column, etc.).
      Or do you just load your reverse crosslinked sample straight to the column? followed by wash buffer.

      Thanks a lot!

      Comment

      • HSV-1
        Member
        • Jul 2012
        • 38

        #4
        Originally posted by samhh11 View Post
        Hi HSV-1,
        Thank you so much for your reply.
        I've been using glycogen to aid precipitation, so I guess that might have caused the huge smear!
        I use bath sonicator, the Diagenode Bioruptor.
        When you use Qiaquick PCR purification column, do you follow their PCR purification protocol? (such as adding PB buffer 5 times the volume of your sample before loading to column, etc.).
        Or do you just load your reverse crosslinked sample straight to the column? followed by wash buffer.

        Thanks a lot!
        yes, treat as the reverse crosslinked chromatin as PCR.
        good good luck

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.


          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          Yesterday, 07:11 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
          by SEQadmin2


          Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


          The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
          ...
          06-02-2026, 10:05 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Single-Cell Sequencing at an Inflection Point: Early Impacts of New Platforms and Emerging Trends
          by SEQadmin2


          With the launch of new single-cell sequencing platforms in 2026, the field stands at an exciting inflection point. This article surveys the most impactful advances in the field and discusses how they’re reshaping research in cancer, immunology, and beyond.


          Introduction

          Single-cell sequencing technologies have undergone remarkable advances over the past decade, transitioning from low-throughput experimental approaches to highly scalable platforms capable of...
          05-22-2026, 06:42 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        20 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
        0 responses
        38 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
        0 responses
        44 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
        0 responses
        49 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...