Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jazz710
    Member
    • Oct 2012
    • 41

    Opinion: Skip Size Selection Step?

    Hey everyone. I looked through the forums and this topic hadn't been mentioned in a while, so I hope it's alright to bring it back up.

    I'm going to run a ChIP-seq experiment and this will be the first time I'm trying to make my own libraries (Illumina TruSeq ChIP-Seq Kit).

    My chromatin was sheared via enzymatic digestion using the Atlantis dsDNAse from Zymo. The chromtain was sheared down to mononucleosomal level (see attached gel picture (1kb+ Ladder, Sample 1, Sample 2, Sample 3).

    My question is this: If my DNA is already sheared down to mononucleosomal levels, I can skip the size selection step for the library prep, right? I'm capable of running gels and excising bands, but I have 48 libraries to prep so I'd really rather not do more work if it's not helpful. Thoughts?
    Attached Files
  • nucacidhunter
    Jafar Jabbari
    • Jan 2013
    • 1250

    #2
    Gel excision step in Illumina’s ChIPSeq protocol is to remove unligated adapters and adapters ligated to other ones (this can only happen in absence of A overhang!). Adapter dimers are around 120 bp after PCR and adapter multimers obviously will be longer. Illumina recommends gel cut in 280-320 bp range to ensure that adapters have been removed and they will not end up in sequencing library. My experience is that purification of ligation products with 1x beads twice is sufficient to remove remaining adapters and it will select the insert sizes larger than 50 bp which is recommended cycle number for ChIPseq. Larger fragments are not a problem as they will be selected against during clustering. So, my suggestion would be to skip size-selection, but to be sure that no adapter residues are carried over perform a small scale PCR (15-20 ul) with couple of samples and run the product straight on Bioanalyser or TapeStation to asses presence of primer dimers. If they look OK , then you can proceed for full scale PCR for all samples.

    Comment

    • jazz710
      Member
      • Oct 2012
      • 41

      #3
      Thanks!

      Originally posted by nucacidhunter View Post
      So, my suggestion would be to skip size-selection, but to be sure that no adapter residues are carried over perform a small scale PCR (15-20 ul) with couple of samples and run the product straight on Bioanalyser or TapeStation to asses presence of primer dimers. If they look OK , then you can proceed for full scale PCR for all samples.
      Appreciate the advice! I'll still humor other responses, but that was my feeling as well.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
        by SEQadmin2



        Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
        ...
        07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
        by SEQadmin2



        Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

        There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
        07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:26 AM
      0 responses
      13 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
      0 responses
      26 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
      0 responses
      16 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
      0 responses
      33 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...