Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • laurynas
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2014
    • 1

    libraries messed up after thawing

    Hi all,

    I'm having some issues with my library prep. Basically I prepared the libraries and the TapeStation gel looked beautiful - no adapters, primer dimers or anything . I froze the libraries until I got access to the sequencer. Then once I thawed them, I decided to run them on the TapeStation again, to make sure they're ok - and, oh horror, it was nothing like what I saw before freezing them. I even tried heating them to 95'C for 5min and cooling to RT at 2'C/min and still - awful smear. Any idea why this is? (images attached)

    I tried running those libraries on the NextSeq and apparently I have "massive" contamination with adapters and due to that there's not enough diversity in my sequence for the instrument to calibrate itself within the first runs. But there were no adapters or primer dimers on the gel visible before freezing the samples.

    Very confusing any ideas/advice would be hugely appreciated!
    Attached Files
  • Seqwork
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2014
    • 4

    #2
    Try qPCR to see what you have.

    Comment

    • pmiguel
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2008
      • 2328

      #3
      What library prep method did you use? How many cycles of amplification?
      Also what are the spike-in standard sizes for your tapestation runs?

      I can say we normally freeze libraries and don't see issues with them. Are you sure these are the same tubes you ran on the TapeStation previously?

      --
      Phillip

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      11 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      14 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      20 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      54 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...