Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • cheezemeister
    Member
    • Oct 2014
    • 36

    Alternative Sonicators?

    I'm setting up sequencing in our lab. Will be purchasing a Nextseq 500. I looked into the price of a Covaris E220 and nearly had a heart attack. It's approaching the cost of the Nextseq!! And the LE220 costs MORE than the Nextseq!! I looked at the M220, which is significantly cheaper, but only does one sample at a time and requires a TON of hands-on time from a technician.

    I'm hoping the community here can provide some alternatives to Covaris. I'm looking for a sonicator that can do multiple samples, either sequentially without technician involvement (like the Covaris E220), or in parallel (like the LE220). Plate format is not an absolute requirement. We may, at times, want to do up to 96 samples in a run. I've found Qsonica online and they look like they might be a good option. Any others I should look at?
  • IdahoRAD
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2014
    • 9

    #2
    All I can add is that I have used the Biorupter, by Diagenode. With the biorupter, I have a hard time getting it to shear in the size range that I prefer, it seems to "over shear," so that when I have to do a size selection, I cut away a good portion of my DNA. With the Covaris, the support is very good and things seem to be well-troubleshooted. I spend weeks optimizing things with the Biorupter, by Diagenode, only to get rather inconsistent results.

    Comment

    • MU Core
      Member
      • Apr 2008
      • 60

      #3
      Covaris is releasing a medium throughput instrument called the E2220 Evolution. It is essentially an E220 instrument that will shear in an 8-strip tube format. Cost is ~$60,000. The instrument will be upgradeable to a 96-well format as your shearing demands grow.

      I would echo the previous post that the Covaris instrument gives very consistent shearing results.

      Comment

      • SNPsaurus
        Registered Vendor
        • May 2013
        • 525

        #4
        Are non-sonication fragmenters out of the question (like Nextera)?
        Providing nextRAD genotyping and PacBio sequencing services. http://snpsaurus.com

        Comment

        • bilyl
          Member
          • Aug 2013
          • 52

          #5
          What kind of samples will you be processing? For many applications NEB Fragmentase could be your best bet even though sometimes it is a bit finicky.

          Alternatively, you should look around your institution for a Covaris machine. It's likely someone has one and you can hop in on the service contract if you plan on using it a lot. You can also see if you can pool several investigators together to get an E220.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
            by SEQadmin2



            Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
            ...
            07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
            by SEQadmin2



            Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

            There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
            07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
          0 responses
          20 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
          0 responses
          30 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
          0 responses
          18 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
          0 responses
          34 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...