Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • gantzgraf
    Junior Member
    • May 2010
    • 1

    Can Oragene-DNA be used for targeted capture and clonal sequencing?

    Hi All,

    I wondered if people could humour what might be a very naive question. We deal with a lot of samples that are collected from saliva using Oragene collection kits which we have found to provide good quality DNA for general PCR methods, SNP chipping etc. However, as we are starting to use clonal sequencing are these saliva samples of any use? Is the potential for bacterial contamination a serious problem and are there any other factors that would make these DNAs unsuitable? We have asked the manufacturers but are yet to hear anything back.

    I am aware of colleagues who have used long-range PCR enrichment methods on saliva samples but for our uses we require targeted capture. So far we have only worked on samples extracted from blood.

    We're using Agilent SureSelect reagent for our captures and the Illumina GA for our sequencing. I'd be very interested to hear if anyone has any experience with this or if it's just generally considered to be a bad idea.

    Thanks

    Dave
  • grace033
    Junior Member
    • May 2010
    • 5

    #2
    TA clone may be use to test your sample, and bioinformatics analysis can also remove polluted reads. But target capture for Agilent or nimblegen, need much more DNA. does saliva contain much expressed DNA?

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • SEQadmin2
      Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
      by SEQadmin2



      Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

      There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
      Today, 05:17 AM
    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:08 AM
    0 responses
    6 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:05 AM
    0 responses
    7 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    31 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    28 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...