I know that one of Covaris' claims to fame is that their AFA shearing is DNA concentration independent. They have literature showing bioanalyzer traces of identical size distributions obtained from 50ng and 2ug samples. Has anyone tried to shear more than 2ug of DNA in a single treatment? Any thoughts about whether the size distribution will be altered if I try to shear 10ug+ in a single treatment with parameters that were optimized on 1ug samples?
Unconfigured Ad
Collapse
X
-
I have sheared from 1-5000 ng with similar results. Covaris recommendation is for 100-5000 ng. Trial with your DNA is the best way. I would suggest normalising sheared DNA to the same concentration for all samples (if using various concentrations) before Bioanalyser analysis.
-
Thanks for the info, nucacidhunter. I did a trial with non-precious gDNA and I got equal shearing using samples containing 1ug and 5ug of DNA (as quantified by picogreen). However, samples containing 10ug and 20ug of DNA ended up with a broad, almost bimodal distribution of fragment sizes.
In the future I'll simply break up my high-mass samples into 5ug chunks and shear each chunk independently. I bead-purify after shearing anyway, so it will be easy to re-concentrate the total fragmented pool.
Comment
-
Covaris shearing of DNA is indeed concentration independent. I have attached one customer's data in which they carried out a shearing of 1-50ug of DNA in 130ul volume in a microTUBE.
As Nucacidhunter suggested, I would also advise that you determine a working range of concentration for your samples, and try to keep your samples within that range so as not to bias or adversely effect the efficiency of other steps in your library preparation.
Thank you
hamidAttached Files
Comment
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by SEQadmin2
CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).
Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into...-
Channel: Articles
07-31-2026, 11:01 AM -
ad_right_rmr
Collapse
News
Collapse
| Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 08-24-2026, 10:32 AM
|
0 responses
25 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
08-24-2026, 10:32 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 08-20-2026, 11:17 AM
|
0 responses
40 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
08-20-2026, 11:17 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 08-18-2026, 10:05 AM
|
0 responses
40 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
08-18-2026, 10:05 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 08-13-2026, 12:22 PM
|
0 responses
49 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
08-13-2026, 12:22 PM
|
Comment