Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sfranzenburg
    Member
    • Mar 2014
    • 28

    Library Quantification - Size Adjustment

    Hi,
    when you measure the concentration of your input gDNA or libraries (illumina nextera in my case), do you use the same DNA standards (=kit contents) for both? In my understanding, the standards should have a similar size than the actual sample, which is extremely different between input gDNA and 400pb libraries.
    The protocol from Quantifluor mentions this problem (and recommends self-made standards), the protocols for Qubit or Quant-IT don't. Both use lambda DNA (size ~ 48,5 kb) as standards.

    How do you handle that in your everyday routine?

    best,
    Sören
  • pmiguel
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2008
    • 2328

    #2
    A given number of base pairs of double stranded DNA is going to bind a given amount of fluor. How would the length of the DNA molecules change the result?

    --
    Phillip

    Comment

    • sfranzenburg
      Member
      • Mar 2014
      • 28

      #3
      Well, that was my understanding as well.
      But the fact that the Quantifluor-Manual states that you should use standards of the same size as the sample made me wonder if it is really linear.

      quote from the manual:
      "Even though the Lambda DNA Standard is provided with the QuantiFluor dsDNA System, we recommend preparing a standard curve using dsDNA of a similar size as the dsDNA you wish to quantitate. For example, if you are quantitating genomic DNA, you should prepare a standard curve using a genomic DNA sample of known concentration."

      I just wondered if people actually do that? But if, how do you get a sample of known concentration to calibrate your method that measures your concentration. Chicken-Egg problem...

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
        by SEQadmin2


        Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


        The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
        ...
        06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      7 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      42 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
      0 responses
      103 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
      0 responses
      125 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...