Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • wingless
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2012
    • 8

    small RNA cloning kit: Illumina vs NEB

    Hi,

    I have been cloning small RNAs with the Illumina TruSeq kit so far.
    However, it is pretty expensive, and I realized that there is also a NEB kit for that purpose which is half the price ($1200 vs $2400).

    Has anyone by any chance compared how the two kits perform, i.e. whether they generate similar results? There are some mentions of "normal" RNA cloning kits comparisons, but I couldn't find anything about the small ones.

    Thanks!
  • nucacidhunter
    Jafar Jabbari
    • Jan 2013
    • 1250

    #2
    Comparison of three major kits has been reported: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/14/319

    This new chemistry http://www.trilinkbiotech.com/work/sRNAPrep.pdf sounds good as dimer prevention technology is innovative and completely different from major kits approach. I do not know if a complete library prep kit has been released using this technology yet.

    Comment

    • wingless
      Junior Member
      • Jan 2012
      • 8

      #3
      Yeah, thanks. I came across this comparison too, but their small RNA input is really tiny (2 ng, while the recommended is 10+ ng), and I was hoping that perhaps if anyone has done the comparison starting more RNA and got smaller variation?...

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      7 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      12 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      20 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      54 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...