Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • TAR76
    Junior Member
    • Jun 2015
    • 2

    #1

    260/230 and RNA-seq library prep

    Hi,
    Does anyone have experience of low 260/230 values for RNA impacting adversely on Illumina truseq total RNA library prep for RNA-seq? I have good 260/280 values and adequate quantities of RNA but low 260/230s. I have heard various opinions about the utility of 260/230 ratios but wondered what other experiences were? Thanks!
  • pmiguel
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2008
    • 2328

    #2
    Originally posted by TAR76 View Post
    Hi,
    Does anyone have experience of low 260/230 values for RNA impacting adversely on Illumina truseq total RNA library prep for RNA-seq? I have good 260/280 values and adequate quantities of RNA but low 260/230s. I have heard various opinions about the utility of 260/230 ratios but wondered what other experiences were? Thanks!
    My opinion is that since you are probably using a Nanodrop that does all the work of producing an entire spectrum for you, why not just look at that rather than use a ratio metric designed back when you had to manually change wavelengths on most spectrophotometers?

    If you did, you might have a chance of identifying the contaminating substance by its UV absorbance spectrum.

    If you are willing to consider the spectrum, check out my thread on this subject:

    Techniques and protocol discussions on sample preparation, library generation, methods and ideas


    The short answer is that the most common culprits for causing your A230 to skew higher are:

    (1) Acetic acid and salts thereof.
    (2) Guanidine -- HCl and Isothiocyanate salts have different spectra
    (3) Betamercaptoethanol.

    Note that I don't include phenol! Phenol has a higher absorbance at A260 than at A230, so it can't be responsible for decreasing your 260/230 ratio. Oh, unless you are using Tris-acetate buffer to equilibrate your phenol. But then it is the acetate, not the phenol decreasing your 260/230 ratio.

    --
    Phillip

    Comment

    • LTJensen
      Junior Member
      • Jan 2014
      • 5

      #3
      Yes, we have seen that low 260/230 ratios negatively affects the TruSeq total RNA prep. When we experience low ratios, we always do a wash on a MinElute filter to improve purity.

      Comment

      • pmiguel
        Senior Member
        • Aug 2008
        • 2328

        #4
        Originally posted by LTJensen View Post
        Yes, we have seen that low 260/230 ratios negatively affects the TruSeq total RNA prep. When we experience low ratios, we always do a wash on a MinElute filter to improve purity.
        Ah, a ritual of purification. I was in a lab once that had a shrine to the "oligod". Lab members would burn pieces of nitrocellulose there before an important molecular experiment.

        Here is something to think about -- what about all the "contaminants" that don't absorb UV? How are you detecting those?

        --
        Phillip

        Comment

        • LTJensen
          Junior Member
          • Jan 2014
          • 5

          #5
          I see your point pmiguel, nevertheless the ritual worked for us... When ratios are fine, we never have problems with that particular protocol.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
            by SEQadmin2



            Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

            Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
            ...
            10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
            by SEQadmin2


            Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

            We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
            ...
            09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:13 AM
          0 responses
          17 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:48 AM
          0 responses
          18 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
          0 responses
          36 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
          0 responses
          42 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...