Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Loren Joseph
    Junior Member
    • Dec 2014
    • 2

    MiSeq prep ancillary equipment

    We have ordered a MiSeq. I have several questions about ancillary equipment. Saw only one partially related post.

    37 degree forced air incubator”. A list of additional recommended equipment calls for such an incubator. The only place where this seems to apply in a protocol (like the TruSight Tumor Sample Prep) is for the extension-ligation step. The only forced air incubators I find and those which the company recommends are essentially 3 foot tall tissue culture incubators. Unfortunately bench space is sorely limited. My first thought was ‘how about a heat block (with a lid)?’ but a 2nd mention in the protocol specifies “not a heat block” . Drat. Apparently the microplate – filter assembly is too large for heat blocks. Can anyone recommend alternative devices? Alternative protocols?
    Library prep in microtubes rather than microplates. The protocol recommends running 16 preps at a time. Some of the steps in the standard protocol, such as using filter plates, would have to be substantially modified, but there are certainly suitable alternatives. Has anyone tried this or do you just use a few wells on the plate?
    Centrifugation of microplates at 20 deg. I was told not to cavalierly interpret this as ‘roughly room temp’. The protocols I looked at call for spins up to 10 minutes and forces of up to 2,500 g. The inexpensive plate spinners I was planning on for ‘pulse spins’ do not have timers and do not have temp control. Any recommendations?

    Other protocols for cancer sample, such as Qiagen’s “Reader” panels or Archer’s panels seem to have fewer requirements but perhaps they have been less extensively vetted.

    As you can tell I am a newbie to NGS, all advice welcome.
  • microgirl123
    Senior Member
    • Jun 2012
    • 199

    #2
    What kind of library preps are you planning on doing? The MiSeq itself doesn't require any other equipment except a heat block or thermal cycler for heat denaturation of certain types of libraries.

    I certainly wouldn't rush out and buy all the equipment for all the different types of library preps!

    Comment

    • Loren Joseph
      Junior Member
      • Dec 2014
      • 2

      #3
      Thanks re MiSeq answer

      Microgirl123 - this reminds me that I should have registered with a nom de plume.

      Thanks for confirmation of my suspicion/concern. Several companies supplying assays targeting nearly the same oncogene/suppressor panel all use the MiSeq sequencing portion (of course) but with seemingly more robust lib prep protocols. I had hoped to use the Illumina panels, thinking they are the most widely used. The Illumina panels might be more flexible than tech support can say, but for now I will go with another vendor for the library prep.

      Regards

      Comment

      • Angelmass
        Member
        • Jun 2015
        • 10

        #4
        It is still unclear what types of preps you are doing, but I will say I'm a bit of a newbie in terms of background knowledge, but average about 6 MiSeq runs/week. The only other equipment that we use are Qubit/Tapestation for quant and library size calculations, thermocyclers for PCR reactions, and we denature with NaOH rather than heat.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        7 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        11 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        19 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        53 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...