Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • drdna
    Member
    • May 2012
    • 76

    Are the Illumina diagrams correct?

    Is it true that single-stranded DNA libraries are initially BOUND directly to the flow cell as suggested in Illumina's diagrams (see panel b in attached figure). I always assumed they simply hybridized to the primer lawns.

  • kmcarr
    Senior Member
    • May 2008
    • 1181

    #2
    Originally posted by drdna View Post
    Is it true that single-stranded DNA libraries are initially BOUND directly to the flow cell as suggested in Illumina's diagrams (see panel b in attached figure). I always assumed they simply hybridized to the primer
    Yeah, that seems a little misleading. I would say that panel b more accurately represents the state after the initial cycle of amplification (primer extension). The flow cell bound primer has been extended using the hybridized library molecule template, then the original template strand has been denatured and washed away.

    It seems the description of the initial stages in the this thread aren't quite accurate.

    Comment

    • drdna
      Member
      • May 2012
      • 76

      #3
      This Illumina figure is also incorrect. As per my understanding, it is not possible to generate double stranded molecules with free ends!



      from the link:

      Last edited by drdna; 07-20-2015, 07:09 AM.

      Comment

      • GenoMax
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2008
        • 7142

        #4
        Is this illustration better: http://www.illumina.com/documents/pr...sequencing.pdf

        Comment

        • drdna
          Member
          • May 2012
          • 76

          #5
          Originally posted by GenoMax View Post
          No, that's the original image that is also inaccurate for a different reason - see original post. It seems that the Illumina folks did not have anyone who understands the technology check the diagrams coming out of their illustration department/provider. I wanted to use an original Illumina illustration in a talk that describes the principle of bridge amplification but the official diagrams will confuse the audience, so I think I'll create my own.

          Comment

          • kmcarr
            Senior Member
            • May 2008
            • 1181

            #6
            Originally posted by drdna View Post
            No, that's the original image that is also inaccurate for a different reason - see original post. It seems that the Illumina folks did not have anyone who understands the technology check the diagrams coming out of their illustration department/provider. I wanted to use an original Illumina illustration in a talk that describes the principle of bridge amplification but the official diagrams will confuse the audience, so I think I'll create my own.
            Try the original paper: Nucl. Acids Res. (2000) 28 (20): e87. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.20.e87. Figure 1.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
            0 responses
            14 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
            0 responses
            27 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 12:03 PM
            0 responses
            33 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-02-2026, 11:40 AM
            0 responses
            23 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...