Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Melanie
    Junior Member
    • May 2010
    • 6

    Fragmentation of RNA or cDNA

    Hi everyone,
    I'm currently making some RNA-seq libraries from ribominus RNA (~500ng purified RNA per sample). I'm trying to work out what are the advantages/disadvantages of RNA versus cDNA fragmentation for a low starting sample.
    Thanks!
    Melanie
  • kalu
    Junior Member
    • Aug 2010
    • 6

    #2
    Hi Melanie
    I have the same doubt... Did you sort it out?
    Cheers, Kalu

    Comment

    • Melanie
      Junior Member
      • May 2010
      • 6

      #3
      Hi Kalu,
      From what I understand if you fragment the cDNA you get biases towards the 3' end of the transcript. If you fragment the RNA then you have a more equal distribution of reads from across the whole transcript with a relative depletion at both 3' and 5' ends. So it really depends what you are after.
      Have a look at Wang et al. 2009 Nat Rev Genet 2009 vol. 10 (1) pp. 57-63 RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics

      Comment

      • kalu
        Junior Member
        • Aug 2010
        • 6

        #4
        Hi Melanie
        I synthesized full-lenght cDNA and amplified it using the SMART technology (SMARTer™ PCR cDNA Synthesis kit, Clontech). Do you think I would still be introducing a bias?
        Many thanks.

        Comment

        • Melanie
          Junior Member
          • May 2010
          • 6

          #5
          I'm sorry I wouldn't really know. I ended up going with RNA fragmentation in the end.

          Comment

          • NextGenSeq
            Senior Member
            • Apr 2009
            • 482

            #6
            Yes, the SMART system gives the among the worst results according to the Broad paper

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by SEQadmin2


              I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

              Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
              06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
            0 responses
            6 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
            0 responses
            11 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
            0 responses
            19 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
            0 responses
            53 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...