Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • szy0931
    Member
    • Aug 2015
    • 51

    lost RNA

    I am using ScriptSeq Complete Kit (Bacteria) to prepare RNA-Seq library. I finished rRNA depletion step and I checked RNA concentration with Nanodrop. I found I might lose RNA from several samples. There RNA concentrations are very low with incorrect 260/280 compared with the other samples.
    I think the RNA might be lost in the step of ethanol precipitation and washing. I want to reprocess these samples. I calculate the remaining reagents and I found I have enough reagents except for the magnetic beads. The kit containing is just too expensive. Anything else I can do? Thank you!
  • Olaf Blue
    Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 58

    #2
    Hello-

    First, Nanodrop is not sensitive enough to be able to quantify output from the rRNA depletion steps; we recommend either a Qubit with Ribo-Green and a Bioanalyzer using a Pico chip.

    What did you use to purify the remaining RNA after depletion and post-streptavidin bead processing?

    Comment

    • szy0931
      Member
      • Aug 2015
      • 51

      #3
      I used ethanol precipitation.
      The samples are from the same strains as the good samples. So, even nanodrop is not accurate, they should not have so bog difference.
      I am wondering I lost RNA during ethanol washing

      Comment

      • szy0931
        Member
        • Aug 2015
        • 51

        #4
        what is the typical yield of the Ribo-Zero rRNA Removal Kits say starting with 5 ug E. coli total RNA?

        Comment

        • Olaf Blue
          Member
          • Nov 2010
          • 58

          #5
          The Illumina user guide reports 8% recovery; from 5 µg of RNA, up to 400 ng of non-ribosomal RNA - to include tRNAs, non-coding RNAs and mRNA (mRNA give the lowest of the recovered RNA in terms of percentages).

          Comment

          • szy0931
            Member
            • Aug 2015
            • 51

            #6
            I started from 2.5 ug
            For some samples which I though they are good gave the concentrations of 20~ 80 ng/ul and I have 10 ul for each samples. So, it looks I should worry about rRNA removal in these "good" samples rather than RNA losing of the "bad" samples

            Originally posted by Olaf Blue View Post
            The Illumina user guide reports 8% recovery; from 5 µg of RNA, up to 400 ng of non-ribosomal RNA - to include tRNAs, non-coding RNAs and mRNA (mRNA give the lowest of the recovered RNA in terms of percentages).

            Comment

            • Olaf Blue
              Member
              • Nov 2010
              • 58

              #7
              Best thing to do is two-fold: 1) Check the RNA post-Ribo-Zero on a Bioanalyzer (if the total RNA was of high quality to start with, you should see disappearance of the two major rRNA peaks (16/23s or 18/28s) and if the RNA was of less that good quality, check with RT-PCR if you are concerned.

              You will never eliminate all of the rRNA - Ribo-Zero is to minimize it as much as possible.

              The small rRNA (5s/5.8s) can be reduced using a Qiagen or Zymo RNAClean column, and following the procedure to recover RNAs >200 nt.

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • GATTACAT
                Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                by GATTACAT
                Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                by SEQadmin2


                I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

                Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
              0 responses
              25 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
              0 responses
              23 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
              0 responses
              23 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
              0 responses
              55 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...