Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • tvdvalk
    Junior Member
    • Sep 2015
    • 1

    Double indexed librariers

    Hi all,

    I am preparing libraries from my DNA extracts but have a question about it. I will pool my samples before doing target capture and then amplify the libraries in a single reaction. Unfortunately, PCR can produce chimeras by recombining different templates molecules (‘jumping PCR’).

    The double-indexing protocol from Meyer et al. 2012 overcomes this problem, since chimeras can be filtered out after sequencing based on the double indexes. My question is, does every sample needs it's own unique P5 and P7 index, or is it enough to use unique combinations (so using the same index multiple times)?

    I have 90 different samples, If I would use 30 unique P5 and 30 unique P7 primers this would give me 900 different combinations of which I use 90. In this case I would be able to 'filter out' (900 - 90) / 900 * 100% = 90% of all chimera fragments, is this correct?

    Thanks!

    Tom
  • Brian Bushnell
    Super Moderator
    • Jan 2014
    • 2709

    #2
    You must never re-use an index if you want to be able to filter all chimeras. But yes, if you re-use indexes but only use a subset of the available combinations, then if you assume random recombination, your math is approximately correct, though the details depend on which specific combinations you choose.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • SEQadmin2
      Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
      by SEQadmin2



      Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

      There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
      Today, 05:17 AM
    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:08 AM
    0 responses
    5 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:05 AM
    0 responses
    7 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    30 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    28 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...