Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mayankkaashyap
    Member
    • Apr 2015
    • 18

    #16
    I take 1 ug of total RNA and ribo deplete it. The leftover is usually 15 % of the total RNA. I am using reagent quantities as prescribed. May I ask how much Input you use??

    Comment

    • nucacidhunter
      Jafar Jabbari
      • Jan 2013
      • 1250

      #17
      250ng-1ug, RIN>8

      Comment

      • mayankkaashyap
        Member
        • Apr 2015
        • 18

        #18
        Hi,
        I have 151 nM/ ul library concentration. I diluted it to 1nM/ul by adding 1 ul to 150 ul water. Now if I take 10 ul from this (1nM/ul) will it be equal to 10 nM/10 ul.
        Or I should dilute 10nM???

        Comment

        • adam.geber
          Member
          • May 2014
          • 40

          #19
          Your desired final concentration of your library will depend on what Illumina sequencer you're using and what the facility calls for. Will you be sequencing this library yourself?

          For reference, Illumina recommends storing libraries at either 2nM (HiSeq/NextSeq) or 4nM (MiSeq) and diluting to the appropriate molarity before clustering. I generally store my libraries at >10nM as I see a gradual drop in molarity over time corresponding adsorption to the plastic storage tube -- this can be mitigated by using "LoBind" tubes and adding Tween to your storage buffer.

          Comment

          • mayankkaashyap
            Member
            • Apr 2015
            • 18

            #20
            Thanks, adam.geber for you reply.
            Sequencing is done by Service provider and they asked me to pool the samples to 10nM for HiSeq 3000. I will consider storing the samples as suggested..

            Comment

            • adam.geber
              Member
              • May 2014
              • 40

              #21
              Definitely a good idea to store at a higher concentration than needed for submission. For reference, you'll need to redilute your 151nM library to 10nM with e.g. 5uL of your library in 70.5uL of dilution buffer or whatever volumes work best for you. Illumina recommends Tris-Cl 10*mM, pH*8.5 with 0.1% Tween 20 rather than water.

              Comment

              • mayankkaashyap
                Member
                • Apr 2015
                • 18

                #22
                Thanks adam.geber. I don't know but I was asked to send samples in MQ water.

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • SEQadmin2
                  Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
                  by SEQadmin2



                  Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
                  ...
                  Today, 11:10 AM
                • SEQadmin2
                  Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
                  by SEQadmin2



                  Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

                  There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
                  Yesterday, 05:17 AM
                • GATTACAT
                  Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                  by GATTACAT
                  Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                  07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:04 AM
                0 responses
                7 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:08 AM
                0 responses
                6 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
                0 responses
                9 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
                0 responses
                31 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...