Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ChP29
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2012
    • 3

    Clontech Stranded - Multiple Peaks

    Hi everybody,
    I tried for the first time the Clontech Stranded mRNA-Seq Kit for Illumina to generate libraries. My starting material (1 ng total RNA isolated from human serum) was ok. However, after library preparation I ended up with a weird looking electropherogram on the Bioanalyzer. My first thought was that this might be due to overamplification, so I reduced the final amplification cycles (12-14-16). Unfortunately, this didn’t solve the problem.
    Do anyone has an idea what’s with these libraries with the expected peak at 300 and the additional peaks at ~400 and 600?

    PS. Fragmentation time was 2 minutes (I also tried 4 minutes)



    Thank you.
    Attached Files
  • nucacidhunter
    Jafar Jabbari
    • Jan 2013
    • 1250

    #2
    I wonder what is the exact name of kit or can you provide a link to the product web page.

    Comment

    • ChP29
      Junior Member
      • Jan 2012
      • 3

      #3
      Hi nucacidhunter,

      the Kit I used is the SMARTer® Stranded RNA-Seq Kit (applicable to 100 pg to 100 ng of input RNA)

      The SMARTer Stranded RNA-Seq Kit generates indexed, Illumina-ready libraries with 99% accurate strand-of-origin data, in less than 4 hours.

      Comment

      • nucacidhunter
        Jafar Jabbari
        • Jan 2013
        • 1250

        #4
        Your post indicates that poly A RNA has been used for input. I wonder what product was used for poly A isolation.

        Comment

        • ChP29
          Junior Member
          • Jan 2012
          • 3

          #5
          It's total RNA. Since I used RNA isolated from serum it corresponds more to rRNA depleted RNA (as checked by Bioanalyzer)

          Comment

          • nucacidhunter
            Jafar Jabbari
            • Jan 2013
            • 1250

            #6
            I looked at the protocol and as you mention it does not seem to be a PCR artefact. I have used the recommended low input library prep kit with DNA and PCR fragment size is proportional to input DNA. It could be:
            1- Fragmentation issue where some cDNA fragments did not shear well (protocol recommends 5 min) so you have a population of cDNA in various fragments hence more than one peak.
            2- The peaks at 400 and 500 bp could be from a particular transcript that over-represented in input RNA. They can prime preferentially at the same region during 1st strand synthesis and result in small dscDNA. Smaller fragments are less likely to be fragmented with sonication and will form their own peak.
            3- If you have some poly A RNA (the source does not matter) you can try prepping library using the same amount and increase shearing time to rule out number 1.
            4- You can also check purified and sheared cDNA on a Chip to look for size distribution if any has left.

            Comment

            • nucacidhunter
              Jafar Jabbari
              • Jan 2013
              • 1250

              #7
              Other possibility is cell free DNA contamination that has been converted to library. Posting input RNA Bioanalyzer profile would be helpful. If your input RNA fragments were short then you might have used non-optimal kit.

              Comment

              • SS00
                PhD Student
                • Jun 2012
                • 33

                #8
                Did you do any pre-processing to the RNA like ribo-depletion? I have seen this with my clontech library prep when I used ribo-zero on my RNA before I put it into Clontech's protocol. It seemed that some salt or other contamination from ribo-zero was interfering with my fragmentation.

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • GATTACAT
                  Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                  by GATTACAT
                  Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                  07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
                • SEQadmin2
                  Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                  by SEQadmin2


                  I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

                  Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                  06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
                0 responses
                7 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
                0 responses
                12 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
                0 responses
                20 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
                0 responses
                54 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...