Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • luc
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 469

    Substitute for Ribozero beads?

    Has anybody had success in substituting the ribozero magnetic beads (which are the limiting reagent in the kits)?
    They are very likely simple streptavidin coated beads; but how much of the substitute will be required?

    Thanks in advance!
  • nucacidhunter
    Jafar Jabbari
    • Jan 2013
    • 1250

    #2
    I do not have direct experience with your query. Beads have a binding capacity that can be found in manufacturer specification sheet and quantity or number of transcripts that are depleted can be estimated. Using twice the estimated amount is a good starting point.

    On the subject of rRNA depletion there are other products which are more cost effective:

    1- Lexogen RiboCop (works by hybridisation of RNA to probes and binding probes to beads similar to Ribo-Zero Gold)
    2- RNaseH based degradation product from NEB
    3- Clontech SMARTer products with kit included RiboGone (RNaseH based) reagent. These products have a considerable time-saving advantage as well because they have ligation-free workflow
    4- Post-cDNA synthesis depletion workflows
    Last edited by nucacidhunter; 12-11-2015, 02:28 AM.

    Comment

    • luc
      Senior Member
      • Dec 2010
      • 469

      #3
      Thanks!

      for plant RNAs the choices are fewer, though. I am looking to substitute the beads for another lab that has lost the part of the kit (the beads) but still has the reagents that were stored in the freezer.

      This protocol (http://www.jove.com/video/50093/depl...enomic-rna-seq) uses NEB streptavidin beads and should be pretty easy to follow (I am not generating our own baits for the moment).

      Comment

      • nucacidhunter
        Jafar Jabbari
        • Jan 2013
        • 1250

        #4
        The issue would be the unknown buffer composition of the beads. They might have adjusted salt concentration to make it compatible with rRNA Binding Buffer carried over to beads. If the buffer is not right then it might affect binding and result in carry over of rRNA to next step. This applies to Ribo-Zero plant that comes with TruSeq stranded total RNA-Seq kit. The workflow for epicentre or stand-alone Ribo-Zero is different but the composition of Magnetic Bead Resuspension Solution still is unknown.

        Edit: for plants other option is NuGEN Ovation kits that uses In-DAC technology and they can design custom probes but I am not sure if hey charge more for custom probes. They mention that design is free.
        Last edited by nucacidhunter; 12-11-2015, 03:05 AM.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
          by SEQadmin2



          Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
          ...
          07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
          by SEQadmin2



          Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

          There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
          07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:26 AM
        0 responses
        13 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
        0 responses
        26 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
        0 responses
        16 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
        0 responses
        33 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...