Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sunitha
    Junior Member
    • Dec 2015
    • 9

    Problem in Making Small RNA Library from Grape

    Hello All

    I am having trouble in amplifying small RNA library using Tru-Seq small RNA kit. I used 1 ug of Total RNA from grape leaf. I had checked the quality using Bioanalyzer (RIN was >8). I have followed the steps as mentioned in the manual precisely. I repeated twice with no result. Please help me trouble shoot this issue.
  • nucacidhunter
    Jafar Jabbari
    • Jan 2013
    • 1250

    #2
    Failure could be due to lack of small RNA in the total RNA prep. Extraction method may have not conserved small RNA fraction.You can rule out this possible cause by running samples on Small RNA Chip.

    Comment

    • sunitha
      Junior Member
      • Dec 2015
      • 9

      #3
      Thank you for your reply. I suspected the same and probed the total RNA with miR166 and found there is accumulation of small RNA but relatively small amounts. I will take your advise and run a small RNA chip. I am also trying to enrich small RNA by miRPremier microRNA purification kit (sigma). Tru Seq recommends 50 ng of small RNA for library preparation. I hope enriching small RNA will resolve my issue.

      Comment

      • sunitha
        Junior Member
        • Dec 2015
        • 9

        #4
        Hello All

        I tried making small RNA library using small RNA purified using miR Premier kit. I did not succeed in getting amplification. We do not have small RNA chips to do bioanalyzer test. Please let me know your suggestions to overcome this issue.

        Comment

        • nucacidhunter
          Jafar Jabbari
          • Jan 2013
          • 1250

          #5
          Using total RNA with 10 ng miRNA content or 10 ng of purified small RNA works well with standard TruSeq small RNA library prep protocol. The input can be as low as 2 ng miRNA in which case PCR cycles need to be increased to compensate for lower input. I would suggest following:

          1- If you do not access to small RNA Chip, you can check success of miRNA extraction on gel as described in the kit user guide.
          2- It is important that RNA is resuspended in the buffer recommended in TruSeq guide.
          3- Using Human Brain Total RNA along with your samples as a positive input control for troubleshooting.

          Comment

          • sunitha
            Junior Member
            • Dec 2015
            • 9

            #6
            Thank you for your reply. I probed the small RNA purified using miRPremier kit with miR166 probe. I did see hybridization. I had eluted the small RNA in nuclease free water. Right now we do not have human brain sample to use as positive control. Is there any chance that some component in the kit might be causing this issue. How stable are these components upon repeated thawing (on ice) and freezing and centrifuging?

            Comment

            • Olaf Blue
              Member
              • Nov 2010
              • 58

              #7
              Grape leaves (Vinifera) typically have issues with complex carbohydrates and polyphenols in the tissues. Possible that these are issues for you? Sometimes, using 1% polyvinylpyrrolidone in the RNA extraction can help.

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • GATTACAT
                Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                by GATTACAT
                Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                by SEQadmin2


                I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

                Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
              0 responses
              7 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
              0 responses
              12 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
              0 responses
              20 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
              0 responses
              54 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...