Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • candicechu
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2015
    • 3

    Using Qubit to quantify microRNAs for TruSeq in small RNA sequencing

    Hi all,

    For small RNA sequencing, we are requested to submit either

    (1) 1 ug of total RNA

    or

    (2) 10-15 ng of microRNA

    Does anyone have the experience using Qubit RNA HS for total RNA quantification or Qubit microRNA assay for microRNA quantification?

    Thanks!
  • nucacidhunter
    Jafar Jabbari
    • Jan 2013
    • 1250

    #2
    miRNA assay would be more specific. Alternatively, samples can be run on Small RNA Chip which will give an indication of miRNA isolation success and concentration.

    Comment

    • candicechu
      Junior Member
      • Nov 2015
      • 3

      #3
      Originally posted by nucacidhunter View Post
      miRNA assay would be more specific. Alternatively, samples can be run on Small RNA Chip which will give an indication of miRNA isolation success and concentration.
      Thanks nucaidhunter! I consulted the tech support of Illumina before and they told to observe the appearance of miRNA peak in small RNA chip but not to trust the concentration given by bioanalyzer.

      Comment

      • nucacidhunter
        Jafar Jabbari
        • Jan 2013
        • 1250

        #4
        Illumina’s comment regarding small RNA Chip quantification accuracy is correct. However, if you submit them to a core facility for library prep they most likely will use small RNA Chip for both purposes to avoid wasting sample. Accuracy of Qubit quantification also can vary widely depending on volume of sample used for quantification and other factors. Input quantity for the small RNA library prep has a relatively wide window so inaccuracy in input (+/-2x) is well tolerated.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        16 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        17 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        20 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        54 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...