Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jpw39
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2014
    • 2

    Unexpected peaks on Bioanalyzer trace, KAPA hyper prep for ChIP-seq library

    Hi all,

    Just wondering if anyone has observed high molecular weight peaks on their bioanlyzer traces for library preps - KAPA or otherwise. These were made from ChIP material with KAPA hyper prep kit, TruSeq adapters and KAPA's primers for amplification from P5/P7 sequences.

    Thanks in advance...
    Attached Files
  • nucacidhunter
    Jafar Jabbari
    • Jan 2013
    • 1250

    #2
    I wonder if you have any trace from input into library. Possible source of large fragments:
    1- Suboptimal shearing of ChIP DNA
    2- Anomaly in bioanalyser run due to library contaminants or run reagents

    PCR would be less likely source of large fragments because polymerase will not be able to copy such large fragments

    Comment

    • jpw39
      Junior Member
      • Jan 2014
      • 2

      #3
      Thanks,

      I suspect the input chromatin was not optimally sheared and I'm not surprised to see that the library material is quite a broad smear. However, the sharp peaks seen running larger than the 10kb marker are particularly strange to me, I can't think how the library prep would give rise to these.

      A bioanalyzer anomaly seems more likely but I had 3 samples on the chip that had not been subjected to library prep which had no such peaks.

      Comment

      • nucacidhunter
        Jafar Jabbari
        • Jan 2013
        • 1250

        #4
        If the library was run before clean up it will affect DNA migration speed on the Chip causing anomaly.

        If you have left over from input material you can run them on the Chip and look for size distribution to see if larger fragments originate from input. The sharp peak could be unsheared chromatin mass.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.


          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
          by SEQadmin2


          Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


          The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
          ...
          06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        30 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
        0 responses
        96 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
        0 responses
        116 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
        0 responses
        109 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...