Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SunPenguin
    Member
    • Aug 2015
    • 38

    IDT xGen kit on RNAseq libraries?

    I'm looking into using the xGen lockdown kit to select for a panel of specific genes from our RNA seq samples. These are low input samples, so my normal workflow is doing about 13 cycles of preamp, then pool and SPRI clean. Then I take that into Nextera, which is then amplified again with the Nextera handles for 12 cycles. This usually produced me with sufficient DNA for a NextSeq run (1-4nM, maybe about 10-20uL total).

    I'm looking into doing a gene enrichment with the xGEN kit after the preamp. but the recommended input of the kit seems really high. It asks for 500ng of material, while my preamp material is usually around 1-2ng/uL (15uL total). Does anybody have any idea whether the kit would still work with much lower input? Or is there a different kit that would be more suited for this purpose? (the libraries are already barcoded. so no additional barcoding is necessary.)
  • FWOS
    Epigenomics NGS Beast
    • Oct 2010
    • 17

    #2
    I've tried the kit with lower input from stranded RNA library preps and it seems to be fine at low coverage (~40X). i'd probably try to stay above 150-200ng for the hybs if you're trying to cut down on input. If duplication rates become an issue you might want to increase input, but it will depend on how deep you want to sequence and on the complexity of your library, pre-cap.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • SEQadmin2
      Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
      by SEQadmin2



      Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

      There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
      Yesterday, 05:17 AM
    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:08 AM
    0 responses
    6 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
    0 responses
    8 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    31 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    29 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...