Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sehrrot
    Member
    • Jul 2010
    • 58

    QuBit fluorimeter vs. Epoch?

    Dear all,

    I measured DNA concentration with two way, QuBit and Epoch.
    For NimbleGen exome capture in Illumina sequencing, DNA is needed 30ng/ul.

    But DNA concentration measured by Epoch (900ng/ul) was way higher than DNA measured by Qubit(700 ng/ul). I used DNA BR kit for QuBit.

    Is Qubit more reliable? I assumed that epoch cannot detect low concentration well.
    Last edited by sehrrot; 09-13-2010, 05:28 PM.
  • v_kisand
    Member
    • Jan 2009
    • 38

    #2
    I am afraid none of them is reliable. When possible use the most conservative value.

    Comment

    • niceday
      Member
      • Apr 2010
      • 68

      #3
      we use Qubit. We find it gives values slightly higher than the bioanalyser but we base our conc's and experiments on the Qubit readings and haven't had any problems. We also use Qubit and bioanalyser after fragmentation...basically whenever the protocols say bioanalyser we also do Qubit.

      Comment

      • Zaag
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2009
        • 112

        #4
        For 30 ng/ul I would use the HS kit on the Qubit.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
          by SEQadmin2



          Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
          ...
          07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
          by SEQadmin2



          Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

          There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
          07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:26 AM
        0 responses
        13 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
        0 responses
        26 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
        0 responses
        16 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
        0 responses
        33 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...