Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ccrachel
    Junior Member
    • Sep 2016
    • 1

    #1

    odd Agilent Bioanalyzer results-total eukaryotic(3D culture) RNA pico assay

    Hello all! I am a phd student , very new to this field... I was growing some 3D spheroids in a Matrigel droplet and I was testing two samples to prepare them for my institution facility which will prepare library (mRNA) for HisSeq Illumina. My two samples(loaded in lane1 and lane3) was extracted using the mirVana rna extraction kit by ambion, invitrogen, eluted in 95oC nuclease-free water, followed by DNA removal by the invitrogen Turbo kit. On nanodrop measurement, the two samples gave concentration readings of 2.6 and 5.4 ng/uL respectively, with 260/280 being 4.71 and 2.3 respectively. However, when the bioanalyzer(pico assay) result from core facility came back, the profile looks very strange and I couldnt identify the RNA bands due to presence of multiple peaks like noise. Does this mean there is no RNA? or is there presence of some contaminants in my sample that I can further treat before having another go at bioanalyzer analysis? i dont really know...Very Grateful for any advice/help!

    thanks a lot in advance

    -ry
    Attached Files
  • nucacidhunter
    Jafar Jabbari
    • Jan 2013
    • 1250

    #2
    Bioanalyzer run has failed and to know if it was sample or assay set up you need to look at ladder run and other samples in the same Chip. If it is your sample try cleaning with a column and rerun.

    Comment

    • microgirl123
      Senior Member
      • Jun 2012
      • 199

      #3
      Based on the Nanodrop readings, your RNA concentration is pretty low, and your 260/280 is awful (especially the one that is 4.71). What are your 260/230 ratios, and what do the Nanodrop graphs look like?

      Comment

      • nucacidhunter
        Jafar Jabbari
        • Jan 2013
        • 1250

        #4
        Nanodrop 260/230,280 ratios are invalid when ng/ul value is below 10-15.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
          by SEQadmin2




          NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
          Today, 06:46 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
          by SEQadmin2



          Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

          Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
          ...
          10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
        0 responses
        23 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
        0 responses
        15 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
        0 responses
        68 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
        0 responses
        48 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...