Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • brcseq
    Junior Member
    • Sep 2016
    • 2

    Neoprep RNA-Seq troubleshooting

    Hello,

    We have had library prep problems using the neoprep for the last 6 runs in a row. It seems like the neoprep library output is failing and/or generating heavily 3' biased libraries with low diversity despite loading 100ng (spec range is 25-100ng) of RNA with RINs of 10, control UHR samples, and samples that previously worked and undergoing 15cycles of PCR.

    We have re-bioanalyzed samples after these failures and they always checked out. We changed all our plastic ware and changed lots of reagents.

    We have run over 40 neoprep runs without very many problems with the exception of last fall when we had a grouping of similar failed runs. So we thought that perhaps the change in temperature was causing dry indoor air and static. So we humidified the air and grounded all our consumables to dissipate static. Still no luck.

    So in general library chemistry, if starting with good input and quality RNA does anyone have any idea how we can be losing so much diversity and gaining strong 3'bias?
  • HESmith
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2009
    • 512

    #2
    Not specific to the Neoprep but, as a rule, 3' bias in cDNA libraries usually indicates a problem with the RT reaction (or degradation, but it sounds like you've largely eliminated that possibility). I'd contact Illumina tech support to see if other users have reported similar problems from the same lot. I've heard that the Neoprep RNA kits are on backorder, which might also reflect an internal issue with quality (it wouldn't be the first time).

    Comment

    • brcseq
      Junior Member
      • Sep 2016
      • 2

      #3
      Hmmm, that is an interesting thought. These 6 runs were actually done with 4 different lots of reagents, but I'm not sure if any of the RT specific reagent lots could have been used across multiple neoprep plate lots. Or perhaps there is a some fluidic issue that isn't properly delivering RT reagents.

      Anyway, great idea to try and look into. Unfortunately, it's not always easy to test individual reagents on the neoprep.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      6 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      11 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      19 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      53 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...