Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • seqprone
    Junior Member
    • Oct 2015
    • 9

    Pooling 'very small' patient samples for ChIP Seq

    Hi everyone!

    I've gone through a lot of threads regarding pooling of samples for sequencing. Unfortunately, I'm not confident if they address my concern.

    My experiment design requires isolation of intact nuclei from patient tissues.

    The isolated nuclei will then be sorted for certain markers and only the nuclei positive for target markers will be used for CHiP-Seq.

    My problem is, the tissue size is about a grain of rice. The very initial hurdle is to get a good number of nuclei to begin with and then their is loss of nuclei during FACS.

    Nuclei isolation improves if I start with more tissues. Can multiple patient samples from the same treatment group be processed together as the initial starting material?

    I hope this question makes sense.

    Would really appreciate any inputs.

    Thanks!

    P.s: patient's are their own control. The samples are taken before and after treatment. We're looking for changes in DNA binding site for few targets.
  • shldbcrzy1
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2016
    • 6

    #2
    I am also doing the same thing but with mouse tissue. Following flow i end up with small # of nuclei and would like to see what suggestions you get for your question.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    25 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    23 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    23 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    55 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...