Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • renuka22
    Member
    • Mar 2017
    • 22

    rna purification

    Hello,

    I have RNA concentration around 15-18 ng/ul (260/280 is 1.5-1.8 but 260/230 is very low ~0.5) on which I need to do polyA library preparation and sequencing. The company said you need to purify the samples. If I purify the samples, I will lose more RNA. Is it risky to go ahead with library preparation without purifying the samples?

    Thanks
  • huguesparri
    Member
    • May 2008
    • 97

    #2
    Hello,

    Did you only use the nanodrop to quantify your RNA samples or did you also perform some integrity checking on bioanalyzer?
    Your concentration is pretty low and your nanodrop ratios are not good: you may have less material than you think...
    You will find attached to this message a bulletin from Nanodrop explaining all this.

    If you plan to purify your sample, you may try Agencourt RNA cleanXP beads from Beckman Coulter.

    Is it risky to go ahead with library preparation without purifying the samples?
    I will answer this question using 2 other questions:
    - Do you think the company asked you to purify your samples just to ruin your day?
    - Do you think performing molecular biology on contaminated samples is risky?

    Regards,

    Hugues
    Attached Files

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    7 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    12 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    20 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    54 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...