Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Innovelty
    Member
    • Sep 2012
    • 14

    PolyA Enrichment Failed, Now What Do I Do?

    Apologies if this doubles. I tried to post before but it didn't seem to work.

    I've had very good success with poly(A) / mRNA enrichment on Sera-Mag Oligo-dt beads in the past. In fact, I had great success just last week. This week, it seemed to fail. I'm trying to figure out why, and if there's any hope I might rescue my samples.

    I use home-made buffers with oligo-dt beads from Sera-Mag. This time (as opposed to last time) I also used RNA Spike-Ins from ERCC. Upon Qubiting my eluted "mRNA" this morning, I determined that I recovered essentially no polyA RNA.

    Differences this time from last time:
    - I opened a new lot of beads. Is it possible the beads are bad? (I'm really hoping for this.)
    - It is possible I didn't wash off all of the Sodium azide solution, I was multi-channeling and having trouble seeing what I was doing. Would sodium azide inhibit polyA capture?
    - I used RNA Spike-Ins, but I did not expect this to cause a problem. It's just a little RNA in molecular-pure water.

    I Qubited the supernatant that I'd saved from the first wash (should be mostly rRNA in 1x Binding Buffer) and it actually had a little bit more RNA than I'd originally had in my sample. Possibly the additional RNA spike-in could account for there being slightly more RNA.

    Should I try redoing this with the supernatant from a couple of the samples, using the "old" beads I used last week that were fine? Should I consider A/B testing these new beads?

    Thanks for any advice you can provide.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
    by SEQadmin2


    Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


    The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
    ...
    06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 11:10 AM
0 responses
6 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
0 responses
42 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
0 responses
102 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
0 responses
124 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...