Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sbarberan
    Member
    • Feb 2017
    • 17

    Single-cell libraries miniaturization

    Any advice from single-cell experts about the best liquid handler for miniaturization of libraries?

    We are considering:
    Mantis (Formulatrix)
    Mosquito (ttplabtech)

    Any comments about either instrument?

    Thanks in advance!
    Sergio
  • Simone78
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2010
    • 208

    #2
    It depends which protocol you want to use.
    If you buy a Chromium or do Seq-well/Drop-seq/InDrop/Nadia system, etc etc most likely you don´t need any robot since the library prep will be done in 1 tube and you´ll never have such a high throughput. It´s very likely you run out of money first because of the sequencing!

    If you plan to do FACS sorting and use a plate-based method (Smart-seq2, MARS-seq, etc) you can choose among several nanodispensers:
    - Mantis: cheaper but not sure it is really high throughput. It might take long to fill up many plates. We don´t have one, I just saw it in action, so take my comment with a grain of salt.
    - Nanodrop (Innovadyne): amazing instrument. Non-contact dispenser, no tips, pretty fast: 30 sec to fill a 384w plate, can do up to 2 plates at the time. Very robust, lower limit pipetting 80-100 nL but it can go down to 50 nl (some modifications required). Uses 96, 384 and, with some tweaking, 1536 plates. We have it and we love it! No humidity chamber, though. Dispensing mineral oil is NOT recommended.
    - Mosquito: we just got one for a trial. Slower than Nanodrop but cheaper (less than half the price), uses quite SOME tips but can dispense any solution due to the positive displacement pipetting system. Nanodrop, on the other hand, is in trouble with solution containing >10-15% glycerol. Can have humidity chamber, which is an advantage if you want to miniaturize your reactions. Lower limit pipetting is 25 nL (HTS) or 500 nL (HV)
    - iCELL8. Uses the same type of dispenser as the Nanodrop but is much more precise and can dispense into 5184 well chips. Lower limit pipetting is 35 nl (theoretical) or 50 nl (real world). However, it uses special chips and requires specific kits (not exactly cheap...), has a higher price tag and you would need to dispense cells by limiting dilutions (= Poisson), which doesn´t make it very competitive, at the moment.

    there are others but this is good enough for a start!
    Best,
    Simone

    Comment

    • sbarberan
      Member
      • Feb 2017
      • 17

      #3
      Thanks a lot Simone!

      We want to use FACS sorting, and we are only looking for an instrument to reliably prepare 1/2 or 1/4 size libraries to reduce cost.

      Cheers,
      sergio

      Comment

      • sbarberan
        Member
        • Feb 2017
        • 17

        #4
        I also was wondering if there are any users with experience with single-cell printing (http://www.cytena.com/SCP.html) and how this could compare to FACS sorting. Looks to me that cells undergo less manipulation/stress with the printer than with FACS sorting, but I have not used the instrument myself. Any single-cell printer users?

        Cheers,
        sergio

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.


          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
          by SEQadmin2


          Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


          The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
          ...
          06-02-2026, 10:05 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Single-Cell Sequencing at an Inflection Point: Early Impacts of New Platforms and Emerging Trends
          by SEQadmin2


          With the launch of new single-cell sequencing platforms in 2026, the field stands at an exciting inflection point. This article surveys the most impactful advances in the field and discusses how they’re reshaping research in cancer, immunology, and beyond.


          Introduction

          Single-cell sequencing technologies have undergone remarkable advances over the past decade, transitioning from low-throughput experimental approaches to highly scalable platforms capable of...
          05-22-2026, 06:42 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        24 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
        0 responses
        40 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
        0 responses
        47 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
        0 responses
        49 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...