Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • NextGenSeq
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2009
    • 482

    #16
    Quick summary of Illumina exome data
    We get ~120 million reads per lane of HiSeq
    The mean exome coverage was about 150X. Thus you can multiplex 2 to 3 whole exomes per lane.
    We found our mutation so it worked pretty well.

    Comment

    • Geneus
      Member
      • Dec 2010
      • 60

      #17
      Originally posted by NextGenSeq View Post
      Quick summary of Illumina exome data
      We get ~120 million reads per lane of HiSeq
      The mean exome coverage was about 150X. Thus you can multiplex 2 to 3 whole exomes per lane.
      We found our mutation so it worked pretty well.
      Thank you...very useful information. Presumably, since each kit allows up to 6 indexes one could choose 50X coverage and do 6 exomes per lane, correct?

      Comment

      • DMO
        Member
        • Aug 2010
        • 28

        #18
        Cluster Density

        When you get 120million reads/lane, what does your cluster density look like?



        Originally posted by NextGenSeq View Post
        Quick summary of Illumina exome data
        We get ~120 million reads per lane of HiSeq
        The mean exome coverage was about 150X. Thus you can multiplex 2 to 3 whole exomes per lane.
        We found our mutation so it worked pretty well.

        Comment

        • asiniard
          Junior Member
          • May 2011
          • 3

          #19
          Originally posted by Geneus View Post
          Thank you...very useful information. Presumably, since each kit allows up to 6 indexes one could choose 50X coverage and do 6 exomes per lane, correct?

          Has anyone tried this?

          Comment

          • GW_OK
            Senior Member
            • Sep 2009
            • 411

            #20
            With the Truseq system we do 6 exomes per pre-capture pool, 3 lanes per pool on the Hiseq and get about 50x coverage each.

            We're happy with the data so far.

            Comment

            • asiniard
              Junior Member
              • May 2011
              • 3

              #21
              Originally posted by NextGenSeq View Post
              We are runnning several Illumina whole exome lanes now on the HiSeq. Once I analyze the data I'll post the coverage here.

              One thing I don't like is that the protocol is very long and tedious. You do two rounds of amplification. Also, you first use the TruSeq DNA kit to make the initial library before the whole exome capture. In our hands about half the libraries didn't yield enough to continue on with the whole exome capture (you need a minimum of 500 ng).
              What do you use to quantitate your libraries?

              Comment

              • NextGenSeq
                Senior Member
                • Apr 2009
                • 482

                #22
                We use NanoDrop and KAPA QPCR

                Comment

                • dottomarco
                  Member
                  • Jul 2009
                  • 32

                  #23
                  I guess it is with the V2 reagents right NextGenSeq?? TrueSeq V3 should produce 375 millions paired end reads oer lane.. So now it should be possible to get 6 exomes per lane with a pretty decent coverage (75X).

                  Did someone try or is trying the new TrueSeq sample prep protocol that allows to skip the gel size selection? I think it was released a couple of weeks ago (regents are the same as before)


                  Originally posted by NextGenSeq View Post
                  Quick summary of Illumina exome data
                  We get ~120 million reads per lane of HiSeq
                  The mean exome coverage was about 150X. Thus you can multiplex 2 to 3 whole exomes per lane.
                  We found our mutation so it worked pretty well.

                  Comment

                  • ashchin
                    Member
                    • Dec 2010
                    • 19

                    #24
                    Hi All,

                    What amount of exome do you get after 12 cycles of PCR, after hybridization using the agilent human all exon version 2.0. I have input 500ng of illumina library for capture hybridization and ended up getting around 700 ng (Based on the readings from Bioanalyzer)

                    PS : I have taken 28 ul of captured DNA into PCR.

                    Thank you,
                    Ashwini

                    Comment

                    Latest Articles

                    Collapse

                    • SEQadmin2
                      Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
                      by SEQadmin2



                      Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
                      ...
                      07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
                    • SEQadmin2
                      Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
                      by SEQadmin2



                      Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

                      There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
                      07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
                    • GATTACAT
                      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                      by GATTACAT
                      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

                    ad_right_rmr

                    Collapse

                    News

                    Collapse

                    Topics Statistics Last Post
                    Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:26 AM
                    0 responses
                    9 views
                    0 reactions
                    Last Post SEQadmin2  
                    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
                    0 responses
                    24 views
                    0 reactions
                    Last Post SEQadmin2  
                    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
                    0 responses
                    16 views
                    0 reactions
                    Last Post SEQadmin2  
                    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
                    0 responses
                    33 views
                    0 reactions
                    Last Post SEQadmin2  
                    Working...