Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ntremblay
    Member
    • Dec 2009
    • 31

    Agencourt Ampure purification kit - exp date

    Hi,

    does anybody has experienced with an expired ampure kit?

    the product datasheet says that the yield is consistent throughout the 12 months shelf life, but I wonder how much it impacts the performance afterward,

    thanks for any information,

    Nick
    Nicolas Tremblay
    Graduate Student

    Cardiovascular Genetics - Andelfinger Lab
    CHU Ste-Justine Research Center
  • ParkerKB
    Junior Member
    • Dec 2011
    • 5

    #2
    I know this is an old post but just came across it...I haven't tried this yet but a number of other posts suggest titrating your ampure beads using a DNA ladder/marker. See the Roche technical bulletin 2011-002 (attached). That would give you an idea of how functional the beads are after expiring.
    Attached Files

    Comment

    • mboth
      Member
      • Oct 2010
      • 23

      #3
      I have just run a test on our AMPure XP beads, between new beads with ones that were 4 months over their expiry date. I compared different titrations on a ladder, and saw no difference whatsoever!

      Comment

      • TonyBrooks
        Senior Member
        • Jun 2009
        • 303

        #4
        It's hit and miss for us.
        Sometimes they work well, sometimes we've run samples with out of date beads and lost everything. I guess some of it may depend on how many times they've been used (i.e. brought up to room temp and cooled again).

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        11 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        13 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        20 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        54 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...