Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • cement_head
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2012
    • 264

    BluePippin vs PippinPrep

    Hello,

    Initially SAGE marketed the PippinPrep, and later the BluePippin. These were targeted at two different size selection schemes (90 - 1500 bp) and BP for large fragments. Recently, the BluePippin has been listed as now being able to do fragments starting from 100 bp upwards to 50 Kbp.

    Here's my question: Does the BluePippin now do everything that the PippinPrep can do? Or are there resolution/recovery differences between the two, even though they are listed as being able to recovery virtually the same size fragments?

    Insight from people who either have both, or have used both is most welcome.

    Thanks
  • kmcarr
    Senior Member
    • May 2008
    • 1181

    #2
    Originally posted by cement_head View Post
    Hello,

    Initially SAGE marketed the PippinPrep, and later the BluePippin. These were targeted at two different size selection schemes (90 - 1500 bp) and BP for large fragments. Recently, the BluePippin has been listed as now being able to do fragments starting from 100 bp upwards to 50 Kbp.

    Here's my question: Does the BluePippin now do everything that the PippinPrep can do? Or are there resolution/recovery differences between the two, even though they are listed as being able to recovery virtually the same size fragments?

    Insight from people who either have both, or have used both is most welcome.

    Thanks
    We purchased a BluePippin long ago and it has always had the ability to resolve both long and short fragments, dependent upon which gel cassette and program was run. What the BluePippin has that the regular PippinPrep doesn't is the ability to perform Pulse Field Electrophoresis for resolution of larger molecules.

    Comment

    • cement_head
      Senior Member
      • Mar 2012
      • 264

      #3
      Yeah, okay - but is the recovery of smaller (< 1.5 Kbp) bands from the PippinPrep better?

      Comment

      • nucacidhunter
        Jafar Jabbari
        • Jan 2013
        • 1250

        #4
        There is not any practical noticeable difference, though I have not done any systematic comparison.

        Comment

        • kmcarr
          Senior Member
          • May 2008
          • 1181

          #5
          Originally posted by cement_head View Post
          Yeah, okay - but is the recovery of smaller (< 1.5 Kbp) bands from the PippinPrep better?
          I have only ever used the BluePippin so can't make a comparison. I can say that I regularly isolated 200bp fragments using the BluePippin and was more than satisfied with the results.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
            by SEQadmin2



            Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
            ...
            Today, 11:10 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
            by SEQadmin2



            Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

            There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
            Yesterday, 05:17 AM
          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:04 AM
          0 responses
          8 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:08 AM
          0 responses
          7 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
          0 responses
          9 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
          0 responses
          31 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...