Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • _anli
    Junior Member
    • Aug 2018
    • 4

    PCR amplicon normalization

    Hi all.

    I am looking for robust ways of normalizing concentrations of PCR amplicons.
    I've previosuly done this by concentration measurement using either a nanodrop/qubit or from band intensity from gel electrophoresis.

    I'm now looking into using magnetig beads (SPRI) insetad. The standard beads (like AMPure XP) are in excess when doing the regular PCR clean-up protocols, but thought that perhaps one could dilute them somehow in order to get a pre-determined output concentrations. From this one could also use home-made beads in order to reduce cost.

    Does anybody have any experience in doing these sort of things?

    Thanks!
  • r.rosati
    Member
    • Aug 2015
    • 95

    #2
    This is basically the idea behind ThermoFisher's "Equaliser" NGS kit. In our hands it didn't work particularly well, though. PCR is really more accurate.

    Comment

    • _anli
      Junior Member
      • Aug 2018
      • 4

      #3
      Thanks for the feedback! I've seen that there are several kits doing this sorta thing out there and I've been curious about peoples results.

      What did you mean by PCR being more accurate?

      Comment

      • r.rosati
        Member
        • Aug 2015
        • 95

        #4
        I'm sorry, did I misunderstand you? I thought you were considering libraries, and then what I meant is that qPCR with adaptor-specific primers is a better option than equalizing with SPRI beads. The concentration you get from qPCR is fairly accurate, and you can mix your amplicons in equimolar amount with good success. With SPRI beads we noticed that the amounts often weren't much equimolar.
        If you mean regular PCR amplicons, I never trusted spectrophotometry below 20 ng/ul. I also used to quantify by gel, but currently I use spectrofluorimetry (a Qubit specifically, it works fine but I'm sure other brands work just as well).

        Comment

        • luc
          Senior Member
          • Dec 2010
          • 469

          #5
          I do not believe that the bead surface is strongly limiting the DNA amounts that can be precipitated onto it - at least not when using standard Ampure (PEG/NaCl) buffer.
          It is worth a try.

          Comment

          • ikripp
            Member
            • Jan 2018
            • 19

            #6
            Our workflow uses the Agilent tapestation to quantify the PCR products which are then normalised from this and pooled as required. There are some limitations to the accuracy of this method but provided that all samples are checked on the same machine/same tape type etc. it works quite well.

            Comment

            • ATϟGC
              Member
              • Jun 2013
              • 56

              #7
              I tried to use limiting amount of SPRI beads (Sera-Mag speedbeads and Commercial preparations diluted in their own buffer) for the normalization of amplicons prior to pooling without any success. I always found that the normalization was poor and that the amount of DNA eluted at the end was somewhat proportional to the starting concentration of the DNA. I gave up on it after a few days. Please post your protocol if you find something that works.

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                by SEQadmin2


                I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

                Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
                by SEQadmin2


                Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


                The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
                ...
                06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
              0 responses
              40 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
              0 responses
              102 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
              0 responses
              123 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
              0 responses
              114 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...