Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • lineras
    Junior Member
    • Sep 2019
    • 1

    ATACseq library prep without commercial bought kit

    Hi

    I have previously done ATACseq with the use of the OmniATAC protocol (Corces et al 2017) and the Nextera DNA prep kit from Illumina.

    The old Nextera DNA prep kit, as many of you know, is no longer on the market. However, Illumina sells the transposase enzyme separate from any library prep kit. It is also possible to buy the Nextera indexes separately.

    From what I understand after reading the ATACseq papers by Buenrostro (2013 & 2015) and Corces (2017), in addition to the transposase and the Nextera indexes, I need a PCR mastermix to complete the list of components I need to make sequencing libraries.

    Does anyone know if there are any details about the Illumina transposase adapters or the Nextera indexes that calls for a specific type of polymerase or a specific type of PCR master mix?

    I have been thinking of trying out the NEBnext PCR Master mix. Or the new one from NEB: NEBNext Ultra II Q5®*Master Mix (M0544S)


    Best, Line
  • JackieM
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2015
    • 9

    #2
    I work with trypanosomes, so I used the Muller 2018 protocol for AtacSeq, but I used the Q5 master mix (we prep a lot of standard NGS libraries, so it's what I had lying around) and had great results.

    Comment

    • Meyana
      Member
      • Sep 2017
      • 40

      #3
      I always use the NEBNext High-Fidelity 2× PCR Master Mix (New England Biolabs, cat. no. M0541) for PCR when making ATAC libraries, I find it much more reliable than the one in the Nextera prep kit.

      This is also the one suggested on the original ATAC papers.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      21 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      22 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      21 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      54 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...