Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • kmpphd
    Junior Member
    • Dec 2010
    • 5

    #1

    optimum illumina flowcell cluster density calculation

    Is there an equation, based on the finished library fragment size, for calculating the molar amount of ssDNA that should be added to one lane of a flowcell?
  • HESmith
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2009
    • 512

    #2
    (1500 x DNA concentration in ng/ul) / library size in bp = nM concentration

    Comment

    • GW_OK
      Senior Member
      • Sep 2009
      • 411

      #3
      I think he's looking more for X pM = Y c/mm^2.

      And I think the answer is there is no good answer.

      Comment

      • HESmith
        Senior Member
        • Oct 2009
        • 512

        #4
        Maybe kmpphd would like to weigh in: did you get the answer you were seeking?

        Comment

        • kmpphd
          Junior Member
          • Dec 2010
          • 5

          #5
          Thank you both for the responses. I should have been more explicit in stating my problem, though GW saw where I was going. I was seeking a way to relate pmoles of library fragments of a certain length to the amount of "real estate" that would eventually be taken up by clusters. For this discussion let's assume a single molecule "cluster," and ignore DNA flexibility. To some approximation, Cluster Area = (# of clusters <in some way related to pmoles of frag>)[3.14(length of frag)^2], right? Based on this rationale, if we then achieve optimal cluster density using X pmoles of a 200 nt fragment, wouldn't we be in the ballpark using 0.25X pmoles of a 400 nt frag?
          If equations don't help, as I assume from GW's further comment, what adjustments do you make for different library fragment lengths?

          Comment

          • HESmith
            Senior Member
            • Oct 2009
            • 512

            #6
            Okay, I get what you're driving at. I think there are several real-world factors that will skew the theoretical calculation. First, the DNA is flexible, so there will be an effective length that's not linear with actual length. Second, the practical upper limit on cluster density is determined primarily by the ability of the imaging software to resolve individual clusters. Any calculation should take into consideration the software, camera resolution, and detector sensitivity (fluorescence intensity decreases as the area increases). Third, the clusters are distributed randomly instead of evenly, and the probability of cluster overlap is not linear with either cluster number or area.

            As a practical matter, we haven't observed much difference between libraries ranging in size from 100bp (some people love to sequence adapter dimers!) to 350bp when loaded at the same molar concentration.

            Comment

            • yaximik
              Senior Member
              • Apr 2011
              • 199

              #7
              Cluster density may be influenced by the density of primers anchored to the cell surface. The paper describing chemistry of primer attachment is vague about this and it is possible it this was empirically optimized.

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                by SEQadmin2



                Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                ...
                10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
                by SEQadmin2


                Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

                We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
                ...
                09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:52 AM
              0 responses
              9 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
              0 responses
              19 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-13-2026, 09:56 AM
              0 responses
              16 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
              0 responses
              27 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...