Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • TruSeq Cluster Generation

    Hi All,

    I've noticed that using the TruSeq genomic library prep kit, rather than my own stock of enzymes/materials, has yielded a much higher cluster density even when both samples are equimolar.

    My theory is that the Illumina kit is working better than my own reagents, so the percent of successfully adapter-ligated DNA is higher, or somehow their proprietary blend of adapters work better than the ones I order from IDT. I do not have qPCR to quantify this, but I was just wondering if others had theories or noticed the same type of thing happening with their libraries.

    Thanks!

  • #2
    We've seen the same thing. We've had a few TruSeq RNA libraries that have over clustered recently. I found your post after searching to see if anyone else had similar issues. We are thinking of switching the concentration we run all TruSeq libraries down to 11pM from our usual 13pM to compensate.

    Comment


    • #3
      Concentration by qPCR? Or fluorimetry?

      --
      Phillip

      Comment


      • #4
        We generally use fluorescence (QuBit) and the average size from the Bioanalyser. It seemed to work really well for the old paired end assay and any homebrew method.
        We also qPCR'd some of the TruSeq 10nM stock that gave us overclustering and we found no correlation between which samples did over cluster and which seemed fine. There was some correlation between our fluorescence estimate and the qPCR though.

        Comment


        • #5
          Hello Tony,
          We have been doing 'home brew' for a few years now and get good clusters but like you we have seen superior clustering with the TruSeq kit generated libraries. With the v5 kits and SCS2.9/RTA1.9 we have been loading 11-12 pM for our home brew libraries and getting fairly consistent cluster numbers (unless we use our indexed adapters ). We also quantify with Qubit. My suspicion is that the kit is way more efficient at the ligation step.

          Comment


          • #6
            Probably some property of the secret oligos that Illumina includes in its "PPC" (PCR primer cocktail) of the TruSeq kit.

            --
            Phillip

            Comment


            • #7
              So very true! They are definitely a lot more secretive than they used to be before they sucked us all in!

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by protist View Post
                Hello Tony,
                We have been doing 'home brew' for a few years now and get good clusters but like you we have seen superior clustering with the TruSeq kit generated libraries. With the v5 kits and SCS2.9/RTA1.9 we have been loading 11-12 pM for our home brew libraries and getting fairly consistent cluster numbers (unless we use our indexed adapters ). We also quantify with Qubit. My suspicion is that the kit is way more efficient at the ligation step.
                If it were just the ligation step, then Tony's qPCR assay would sort that out.
                I think TruSeq amplicons may be more "flow-cell-trophic" and thus attach to the flow cell at higher titres than non-TruSeq amplicons.

                --
                Phillip

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by protist View Post
                  So very true! They are definitely a lot more secretive than they used to be before they sucked us all in!
                  Yes, very irritating. They really are treating the PPC oligos like a state secret. Ridiculous. I'm sure their competitors already know what they are (if they care.)

                  So the ones left in the dark are their customers.

                  I wonder if the granting agencies could just ban this sort of behavior among vendors selling to researchers funded by public monies?

                  --
                  Phillip

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I vaguely remember Illumina mention that they use freakishly high thresholds for oligo quality in the TruSeq kits.....or maybe they were just using that as a reason why the kits are twice the price of homebrew.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Still -- run the PCR Primer Cocktail oligos on a lab chip -- they look ~80 nt long! So something is probably going on there.

                      --
                      Phillip

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        It is my guess, and this is purely a guess based on that fact that Phillip has seen that the oligos are much longer then what seems possible, is that the TruSeq PCR Primer Cocktail has 'overhanging sequence' which is probably extra binding sequences beyond what is in the adapters. If my TruSeq kit ever comes (I've been waiting over a month) I will Sanger sequence the amplicons to try to get to the bottom of this. If someone could mass spec them that would be nice!!! Alternatively they could contain LNA residues as well to enhance binding to the flow cell.

                        Illumina's kits are great, but for some applications we really do need to make the libraries with home-brew protocols, e.g. no TruSeq ChIP-seq kit yet, MeDIP-seq, 4C-seq, etc. And their delivery times to Greece doesn't mix well with the pace at which I like to do science.
                        --------------
                        Ethan

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          By the way, TUFCS JSS you can check out my last couple runs which were done with you guys. Both had low cluster formation and were done with homemade primers similar to what is shown on your protocols. They were highly amplified libraries quantified by qPCR so the problem was not that there was material without adapters causing a high reading.

                          My guess to the cause:
                          1) Unused PCR primer in the library competing for binding to the flowcell. Now I'm using Ampure XP to purify the PCR product so this shouldn't be a problem with my next samples.
                          2) There is something different about Illumina's PCR primer cocktail (see above post). For now, I assume it is probably best to just understate the library concentration.
                          --------------
                          Ethan

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            TUFC, one question, how many cluster were generated compared to how many you would get with TruSeq kits?
                            --------------
                            Ethan

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by protist View Post
                              Hello Tony,
                              We have been doing 'home brew' for a few years now and get good clusters but like you we have seen superior clustering with the TruSeq kit generated libraries. With the v5 kits and SCS2.9/RTA1.9 we have been loading 11-12 pM for our home brew libraries and getting fairly consistent cluster numbers (unless we use our indexed adapters ). We also quantify with Qubit. My suspicion is that the kit is way more efficient at the ligation step.
                              When we use our indexed primer, the cluster formation is not succesful.
                              Do you happen to know why it is like that?

                              Comment

                              Latest Articles

                              Collapse

                              • seqadmin
                                Best Practices for Single-Cell Sequencing Analysis
                                by seqadmin



                                While isolating and preparing single cells for sequencing was historically the bottleneck, recent technological advancements have shifted the challenge to data analysis. This highlights the rapidly evolving nature of single-cell sequencing. The inherent complexity of single-cell analysis has intensified with the surge in data volume and the incorporation of diverse and more complex datasets. This article explores the challenges in analysis, examines common pitfalls, offers...
                                06-06-2024, 07:15 AM
                              • seqadmin
                                Latest Developments in Precision Medicine
                                by seqadmin



                                Technological advances have led to drastic improvements in the field of precision medicine, enabling more personalized approaches to treatment. This article explores four leading groups that are overcoming many of the challenges of genomic profiling and precision medicine through their innovative platforms and technologies.

                                Somatic Genomics
                                “We have such a tremendous amount of genetic diversity that exists within each of us, and not just between us as individuals,”...
                                05-24-2024, 01:16 PM

                              ad_right_rmr

                              Collapse

                              News

                              Collapse

                              Topics Statistics Last Post
                              Started by seqadmin, Today, 07:23 AM
                              0 responses
                              5 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post seqadmin  
                              Started by seqadmin, 06-17-2024, 06:54 AM
                              0 responses
                              11 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post seqadmin  
                              Started by seqadmin, 06-14-2024, 07:24 AM
                              0 responses
                              24 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post seqadmin  
                              Started by seqadmin, 06-13-2024, 08:58 AM
                              0 responses
                              17 views
                              0 likes
                              Last Post seqadmin  
                              Working...
                              X