Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DrDTonge
    Member
    • May 2011
    • 23

    Normalisation

    Dear all,

    Apologies if this is a naive question however I'm just wondering at what stage people implement normalisation steps into their library preparation.

    As a bit of background, I have 30 samples which I wish to run small RNA sequencing (my interest is miRNAs) and then compare the relative expression of these.

    Do people start each reaction with the same quantity of small RNA (as determined by the small RNA chip) and then control for cDNA yield OR input a fixed volume of RNA and then control for cDNA yield?

    I would always usually control at every single stage, however, some samples have much lower small RNA concs so I don't want to risk inputting the lowest amount and risk the libraries failling.

    Your help would be much appreciated,

    D
  • DrDTonge
    Member
    • May 2011
    • 23

    #2
    Sorry guys...any thoughts?

    Comment

    • pbluescript
      Senior Member
      • Nov 2009
      • 224

      #3
      I don't do small RNA sequencing, but generally, I do put in the same amount of input. However, as the actual sequencing requires such a tiny amount of library, you usually just sample a small aliquot from your finished library. If you are worried about some libraries failing, then I would start with more.

      Comment

      • DrDTonge
        Member
        • May 2011
        • 23

        #4
        Thanks for your response.

        Given the large variation between samples (this is expected as they are from different disease stages) I am going to start with a standard volume of RNA (3ul) and then normalise by adding a fixed concentration of cDNA library into the sequencing reaction.

        Best wishes,

        D

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
          by SEQadmin2


          Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


          The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
          ...
          06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        5 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        16 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        49 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
        0 responses
        109 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...