Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • charltt
    Junior Member
    • Jun 2011
    • 5

    #1

    Choosing an Assembler(s)

    Hey all,

    I am trying to choose the best assembler(s) for a project I am working on. I was looking through the wiki page, and there are so many different choices of assemblers available. I was wondering if anyone would be able to provide any insight into some of the better options.

    I will be working on a Linux machine, with a genome size of approximately 64Mb long. The data is in short (40b), single-end reads from the Illumina Solexa Genome Analyzer. I am looking to assemble to a set of reference contigs/scaffolds as well as de novo and compare the results of both. So far, I am looking into using MAQ for the assembly to reference and Velvet for the de novo assembly. Any thoughts?

    Thanks!
  • Apexy
    Member
    • Apr 2011
    • 62

    #2
    Hi,

    I think you are on the right track. You may recruit ABySS and RAY subsequently. I think the journey starts with a step so velveth is.

    Cheers

    Comment

    • nickloman
      Senior Member
      • Jul 2009
      • 355

      #3
      Originally posted by charltt View Post
      Hey all,
      I will be working on a Linux machine, with a genome size of approximately 64Mb long. The data is in short (40b), single-end reads from the Illumina Solexa Genome Analyzer. Any thoughts?
      Thanks!
      I'd consider giving up now ... your dataset is not really fit for purpose.

      Comment

      • charltt
        Junior Member
        • Jun 2011
        • 5

        #4
        Originally posted by nickloman View Post
        I'd consider giving up now ... your dataset is not really fit for purpose.
        What makes you say this? There is alot of literature out there about assembling whole mammalian genomes (which are much larger than the one I am working with) from short reads. My biggest concern is that the reads are single-end rather than paired-end. Is this what you are referring to?

        Comment

        • nickloman
          Senior Member
          • Jul 2009
          • 355

          #5
          Originally posted by charltt View Post
          My biggest concern is that the reads are single-end rather than paired-end. Is this what you are referring to?
          Yes, I think you really need paired-end reads to even make a start here. Mate-pair reads or longer reads also extremely helpful.

          You can validate this easily enough with your dataset; run Velvet with a k-mer of 23 or so and see what the results are like.

          Comment

          • konrad98
            Member
            • Jan 2009
            • 17

            #6
            As Nick alluded, a single type of library will never give you as good an assembly as a mix of different insert sizes and read lengths. However single-end reads should be enough to give you most genes depending on repeats, gc bias and the size of introns.

            Comment

            • dawe
              Senior Member
              • Apr 2009
              • 258

              #7
              Hi, I have just seen a keynote about SUTTA which seems to outperform most of the assemblers I've used so far.

              d

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                by SEQadmin2



                Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                ...
                10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
                by SEQadmin2


                Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

                We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
                ...
                09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
              0 responses
              27 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
              0 responses
              20 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
              0 responses
              36 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
              0 responses
              43 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...