Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • charltt
    Junior Member
    • Jun 2011
    • 5

    #1

    Choosing an Assembler(s)

    Hey all,

    I am trying to choose the best assembler(s) for a project I am working on. I was looking through the wiki page, and there are so many different choices of assemblers available. I was wondering if anyone would be able to provide any insight into some of the better options.

    I will be working on a Linux machine, with a genome size of approximately 64Mb long. The data is in short (40b), single-end reads from the Illumina Solexa Genome Analyzer. I am looking to assemble to a set of reference contigs/scaffolds as well as de novo and compare the results of both. So far, I am looking into using MAQ for the assembly to reference and Velvet for the de novo assembly. Any thoughts?

    Thanks!
  • Apexy
    Member
    • Apr 2011
    • 62

    #2
    Hi,

    I think you are on the right track. You may recruit ABySS and RAY subsequently. I think the journey starts with a step so velveth is.

    Cheers

    Comment

    • nickloman
      Senior Member
      • Jul 2009
      • 355

      #3
      Originally posted by charltt View Post
      Hey all,
      I will be working on a Linux machine, with a genome size of approximately 64Mb long. The data is in short (40b), single-end reads from the Illumina Solexa Genome Analyzer. Any thoughts?
      Thanks!
      I'd consider giving up now ... your dataset is not really fit for purpose.

      Comment

      • charltt
        Junior Member
        • Jun 2011
        • 5

        #4
        Originally posted by nickloman View Post
        I'd consider giving up now ... your dataset is not really fit for purpose.
        What makes you say this? There is alot of literature out there about assembling whole mammalian genomes (which are much larger than the one I am working with) from short reads. My biggest concern is that the reads are single-end rather than paired-end. Is this what you are referring to?

        Comment

        • nickloman
          Senior Member
          • Jul 2009
          • 355

          #5
          Originally posted by charltt View Post
          My biggest concern is that the reads are single-end rather than paired-end. Is this what you are referring to?
          Yes, I think you really need paired-end reads to even make a start here. Mate-pair reads or longer reads also extremely helpful.

          You can validate this easily enough with your dataset; run Velvet with a k-mer of 23 or so and see what the results are like.

          Comment

          • konrad98
            Member
            • Jan 2009
            • 17

            #6
            As Nick alluded, a single type of library will never give you as good an assembly as a mix of different insert sizes and read lengths. However single-end reads should be enough to give you most genes depending on repeats, gc bias and the size of introns.

            Comment

            • dawe
              Senior Member
              • Apr 2009
              • 258

              #7
              Hi, I have just seen a keynote about SUTTA which seems to outperform most of the assemblers I've used so far.

              d

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
                by SEQadmin2



                CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

                Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
                ...
                07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
                by SEQadmin2


                Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

                The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
                ...
                07-20-2026, 11:48 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, 08-13-2026, 12:22 PM
              0 responses
              25 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 08-11-2026, 10:35 AM
              0 responses
              21 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 08-06-2026, 07:41 AM
              0 responses
              34 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
              0 responses
              51 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...