Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • infrared1983
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2011
    • 1

    #1

    Compare Genomes

    Hi everyone, I did Genome assembly by SOAPdenovo and obtained contigs and scaffolds, now I wanna compare these scaffolds to some reference genomes downloaded from Genbank. I am wondering what tools I can use to do this job, I used BLAST but it is not in good visualization, any other advice on such tools and programs?
    I am new to this, any suggestion is appreciated.
    Thanks
  • jmw86069
    Member
    • Jun 2009
    • 31

    #2
    Use NUCmer from the MUMmer package (available from Sourceforge.) For large reference genomes, you have to split the reference into smaller pieces for it to fit in memory, then align everything to those pieces. It is relatively fast and efficient, and seems to be a commonly used tool as the basis for other assembly comparison pipelines. There are some recently available wrapper scripts which automate some of the steps, but it's not tough to run through the steps yourself. The online docs for MUMmer as a whole are very good.

    Comment

    • lh3
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2008
      • 686

      #3
      For mammalian genomes, use bwa-sw. Two human assemblies in several CPU days.

      Comment

      • HerefordGuy
        Junior Member
        • Apr 2010
        • 6

        #4
        De novo to reference comparison

        I have had good luck with both MUMmer and MAUVE.
        MAUVE is very straight forward and MUMmer I simply follow the recipes in the manuel.

        Comment

        • narain
          Banned
          • Aug 2011
          • 73

          #5
          But is it good to use the contigs files or to use the scaffolds files for comparison?

          Comment

          • HerefordGuy
            Junior Member
            • Apr 2010
            • 6

            #6
            Compare Genomes

            I suppose it depends what your question is.
            But, typically the goal of genome assembly is to create one scaffold per chromosome (assemble the entire genome/chromosome). With this in mind, I think it would make more sense to compare scaffolds to scaffolds.

            Comment

            • narain
              Banned
              • Aug 2011
              • 73

              #7
              However, scaffolds are nothing but a combination of contigs filled with "estimates" of gaps in between. Does that not mean then that it is more sensible to compare contigs than to compare scaffolds as it has estimate of gaps in between which may be highly erroneous!

              Comment

              Latest Articles

              Collapse

              • SEQadmin2
                Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
                by SEQadmin2



                CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

                Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
                ...
                07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
                by SEQadmin2


                Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

                The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
                ...
                07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
              • SEQadmin2
                Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
                by SEQadmin2



                Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
                ...
                07-09-2026, 11:10 AM

              ad_right_rmr

              Collapse

              News

              Collapse

              Topics Statistics Last Post
              Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:13 AM
              0 responses
              10 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
              0 responses
              22 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
              0 responses
              19 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Started by SEQadmin2, 07-23-2026, 11:41 AM
              0 responses
              17 views
              0 reactions
              Last Post SEQadmin2  
              Working...