Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bsuac6
    Junior Member
    • Sep 2010
    • 9

    EdgeR GLM linear regression of time series

    Hi All,

    I am using RNA-seq data. I have 3 time points in my data 6 months (young), 12 months (middle) and 28 months (old). I want to do a differential expression analysis across the 3 time points. I have used EdgeR GLM to do this though the design isnt allowing me to look at linear changes with increasing age whilst taking into account the expression at middle age. So after looking on lots of forums I have come up with a work round (see below). Though not being experienced in R or statistics I am not sure it is doing what I want it to. Could someone please look it over and see if I am actually getting linear changes with increasing age whilst taking in account the expression at middle age?
    Many thanks

    > library(edgeR)
    > library(limma)
    > targets<-read.delim (file="coding_targets.txt")
    > targets$age<-C(targets$age,poly,1)
    > attr(targets$age,"contrasts")
    .L
    a-young -7.071068e-01
    b-middle -7.850462e-17
    c-old 7.071068e-01
    > targets$sample<-factor(targets$sample)
    > targets
    X files age sample
    1 p1 p1_coding_counts.txt a-young 1
    2 p2 p2_coding_counts.txt a-young 2
    3 p3 p3_coding_counts.txt a-young 3
    4 p7 p7_coding_counts.txt b-middle 7
    5 p8 p8_coding_counts.txt b-middle 8
    6 p9 p9_coding_counts.txt b-middle 9
    7 p4 p4_coding_counts.txt c-old 4
    8 p5 p5_coding_counts.txt c-old 5
    9 p6 p6_coding_counts.txt c-old 6
    > d<-readDGE(targets, skip=1, comment.char='#')
    > colnames(d)<-row.names(targets)
    > d<- calcNormFactors(d)
    > d
    An object of class "DGEList"
    $samples
    X files age sample lib.size norm.factors
    1 p1 p1_coding_counts.txt a-young 1 3445622 0.9655724
    2 p2 p2_coding_counts.txt a-young 2 2696547 0.9902573
    3 p3 p3_coding_counts.txt a-young 3 3308099 0.9787044
    4 p7 p7_coding_counts.txt b-middle 7 2503479 1.0584660
    5 p8 p8_coding_counts.txt b-middle 8 2639127 1.0477893
    6 p9 p9_coding_counts.txt b-middle 9 2696547 0.9902573
    7 p4 p4_coding_counts.txt c-old 4 3037440 0.9778553
    8 p5 p5_coding_counts.txt c-old 5 2647915 1.0144109
    9 p6 p6_coding_counts.txt c-old 6 2475370 0.9809077

    $counts
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
    ENSRNOG0000000xxxx 1287 1285 1041 788 968 1285 1092 1009 960
    ENSRNOG0000000xxxx 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
    ENSRNOG0000000xxxx 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0
    ENSRNOG0000000xxxx 38 405 50 18 105 405 372 42 282
    ENSRNOG0000000xxxx 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    22932 more rows ...
    > d<-d[rowSums(d$counts)>9,]
    > design<- model.matrix(~ age, data = targets)
    > design
    (Intercept) age.L
    1 1 -7.071068e-01
    2 1 -7.071068e-01
    3 1 -7.071068e-01
    4 1 -7.850462e-17
    5 1 -7.850462e-17
    6 1 -7.850462e-17
    7 1 7.071068e-01
    8 1 7.071068e-01
    9 1 7.071068e-01
    attr(,"assign")
    [1] 0 1
    attr(,"contrasts")
    attr(,"contrasts")$age
    .L
    a-young -7.071068e-01
    b-middle -7.850462e-17
    c-old 7.071068e-01
    > d<-estimateGLMCommonDisp(d, design)
    > glmfit<- glmFit(d, design, dispersion=d$common.dispersion)
    > results<- glmLRT(d, glmfit, coef=c(2))
    > topTags(results)
    Coefficient: age.L
    logConc logFC LR P.Value FDR
    ENSRNOG000000xxxxx -11.271529 -1.9336775 55.45465 9.564007e-14 1.453825e-09
    ENSRNOG000000xxxxx -10.359443 1.2661223 49.11802 2.410161e-12 1.831843e-08
    ENSRNOG000000xxxxx -11.317494 -1.5480925 47.35359 5.926938e-12 3.003180e-08
  • Gordon Smyth
    Member
    • Apr 2011
    • 91

    #2
    Dear bsuac6,

    edgeR easily allows you to estimate a linear trend with age. Just put age as a column in the design matrix.

    If you're still having trouble with it, could you post your question to the Bioconductor mailing list? See the section "how to get help" in the edgeR User's Guide.

    Best wishes
    Gordon

    Comment

    • David Robinson
      Junior Member
      • Mar 2013
      • 1

      #3
      Gordon Smyth: Given the link function for negative binomial regression, wouldn't this estimate an exponential trend rather than a linear one? (After all, wouldn't a linear trend be impossible since it could lead to a negative expected value?)

      Comment

      • Gordon Smyth
        Member
        • Apr 2011
        • 91

        #4
        Yes. It is a linear trend on the scale of the model formula and linear predictor, and this corresponds to an exponential trend on the scale of the predicted counts.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
          by SEQadmin2



          Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
          ...
          07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
          by SEQadmin2



          Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

          There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
          07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
        0 responses
        24 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
        0 responses
        15 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
        0 responses
        33 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        31 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...