Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • letusgo
    Member
    • Aug 2011
    • 17

    #1

    fastx_toolkit can't work

    when i use fastx_toolkits ,just like fastq_quality_filter:

    $ fastq_quality_filter -q 5 -p 50 -i ./SampleS_1.fq -o ./SampleSfilter_1.fq

    unfortunately,it returns as:

    fastq_quality_filter: Invalid quality score value (char '#' ord 35 quality value -29) on line 4

    how can I solve it ?
  • Alex Renwick
    Member
    • Jul 2011
    • 44

    #2
    The program is using solexa quality scores (starting at 64) instead of sanger (starting at 33). According to the fastx website, support for sanger quality scores was added in version 0.0.13. Which version are you running?

    Comment

    • dfjenkins3
      Junior Member
      • Aug 2011
      • 1

      #3
      Try the command line option -Q 33 to indicate Sanger phred scores. That option has worked for me in the past

      Comment

      • letusgo
        Member
        • Aug 2011
        • 17

        #4
        Originally posted by Alex Renwick View Post
        The program is using solexa quality scores (starting at 64) instead of sanger (starting at 33). According to the fastx website, support for sanger quality scores was added in version 0.0.13. Which version are you running?
        i use the version 0.0.13,but it doesn't work too,how can i convert sanger fastq to illumina fastq format?

        Comment

        • letusgo
          Member
          • Aug 2011
          • 17

          #5
          Originally posted by dfjenkins3 View Post
          Try the command line option -Q 33 to indicate Sanger phred scores. That option has worked for me in the past
          i add this option ,but another error is happened like:

          fastq_quality_filter: Invalid quality score value (char 'J' ord 74 quality value 41) on line 4

          Comment

          • sisch
            Member
            • Jun 2011
            • 29

            #6
            Can you post a few (12) lines of your FastQ file?

            Comment

            • mgogol
              Senior Member
              • Mar 2008
              • 197

              #7
              I always thought it was -Q33... Does -Q 33 work?

              [edit] Oh, yes, it does.

              Comment

              • letusgo
                Member
                • Aug 2011
                • 17

                #8
                Originally posted by sisch View Post
                can you post a few (12) lines of your fastq file?
                @hwi-st298:170:81mg3abxx:1:1101:1349:2455 1:n:0:ttaggc
                ctggttcagccttcttaggctcttcttctgtttccttacctcagatcggaagagcacacgtctgaactccagtcacttaggcatttcgtatgacgtatgt
                +
                cccfffffghghfhgiijjfhegi?fhiihfchggggcegggicgebchfhgdhgiiibaf@fh7@@e;7=a;aadd>ccbcca################
                @hwi-st298:170:81mg3abxx:1:1101:1372:2461 1:n:0:ttaggc
                agacggtgttgcataagctgttgtatctgttgctgttgaaactgaaactgctgctgttgctgcttttgttttttagatcggcagggcacacgtgtgcgac
                +
                @@@fff@dfhgff<gaeehggg@@ehafhiiibgg<?ff<?<bf<fg@gg?be<<3?88bf#######################################
                @hwi-st298:170:81mg3abxx:1:1101:1866:2486 1:n:0:ttaggc
                gtcactttgtacctcttctcaaattaggaaaatacgaagttcgaggaacgcctttcgttctctttttttcttggtcggcagggtcagggcctttcttgct
                +
                @@cdffffdddhhegeggeegeh>hhhiigiij>ffcgggeghid0?dfdfggiig1=;;ceggcac<<ce@a@>>>;??>95(9<(38<?<a#######

                Comment

                • kmcarr
                  Senior Member
                  • May 2008
                  • 1181

                  #9
                  Originally posted by letusgo View Post
                  i add this option ,but another error is happened like:

                  fastq_quality_filter: Invalid quality score value (char 'J' ord 74 quality value 41) on line 4
                  letusgo,

                  Are you sure that you are using v. 0.0.13? See this response to a thread about this issue from last year. (Hint, try searching the forum first, your question may already have been answered.) Using v. 0.0.13 and the '-Q 33' option together should work. If it doesn't then your FASTQ file may be malformed.

                  Comment

                  • letusgo
                    Member
                    • Aug 2011
                    • 17

                    #10
                    Originally posted by mgogol View Post
                    I always thought it was -Q33... Does -Q 33 work?

                    [edit] Oh, yes, it does.
                    unfortunately,it doesn't work for my fastq files,then i convert the sanger fastq to illumina fastq.when i run fastq_quality_filter,another error :

                    fastq_quality_filter: Invalid quality score value (char 'i' ord 105 quality value 41) on line 4

                    Comment

                    • kmcarr
                      Senior Member
                      • May 2008
                      • 1181

                      #11
                      Originally posted by letusgo View Post
                      @hwi-st298:170:81mg3abxx:1:1101:1349:2455 1:n:0:ttaggc
                      ctggttcagccttcttaggctcttcttctgtttccttacctcagatcggaagagcacacgtctgaactccagtcacttaggcatttcgtatgacgtatgt
                      +
                      cccfffffghghfhgiijjfhegi?fhiihfchggggcegggicgebchfhgdhgiiibaf@fh7@@e;7=a;aadd>ccbcca################
                      @hwi-st298:170:81mg3abxx:1:1101:1372:2461 1:n:0:ttaggc
                      agacggtgttgcataagctgttgtatctgttgctgttgaaactgaaactgctgctgttgctgcttttgttttttagatcggcagggcacacgtgtgcgac
                      +
                      @@@fff@dfhgff<gaeehggg@@ehafhiiibgg<?ff<?<bf<fg@gg?be<<3?88bf#######################################
                      @hwi-st298:170:81mg3abxx:1:1101:1866:2486 1:n:0:ttaggc
                      gtcactttgtacctcttctcaaattaggaaaatacgaagttcgaggaacgcctttcgttctctttttttcttggtcggcagggtcagggcctttcttgct
                      +
                      @@cdffffdddhhegeggeegeh>hhhiigiij>ffcgggeghid0?dfdfggiig1=;;ceggcac<<ce@a@>>>;??>95(9<(38<?<a#######
                      O.K. I missed this before. Clearly your quality lines are malformed; are these after you converted them? You have ASCII values ranging from 35 (#) to 105 (i). No valid FASTQ files for Illumina reads uses a range this wide.

                      Comment

                      • letusgo
                        Member
                        • Aug 2011
                        • 17

                        #12
                        Originally posted by kmcarr View Post
                        O.K. I missed this before. Clearly your quality lines are malformed; are these after you converted them? You have ASCII values ranging from 35 (#) to 105 (i). No valid FASTQ files for Illumina reads uses a range this wide.
                        they come from a seqencing company,i didn't convert them.but when i convert them to Illumina fastq,their ASCII values is also malformed,what can i do?

                        Comment

                        • arvid
                          Senior Member
                          • Jul 2011
                          • 156

                          #13
                          Originally posted by letusgo View Post
                          they come from a seqencing company,i didn't convert them.but when i convert them to Illumina fastq,their ASCII values is also malformed,what can i do?
                          Ask the company what they did to create such data..?

                          Comment

                          • ishmael
                            Member
                            • Jul 2008
                            • 17

                            #14
                            Just curious, I googled the unique machine id: hwi-st298.
                            And I found this:
                            http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=15928
                            It looks that the company triggered the malformation not the first time.
                            Which company it is? BGI?

                            Comment

                            Latest Articles

                            Collapse

                            • SEQadmin2
                              Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                              by SEQadmin2



                              Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                              Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                              ...
                              10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
                            • SEQadmin2
                              New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
                              by SEQadmin2


                              Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

                              We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
                              ...
                              09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

                            ad_right_rmr

                            Collapse

                            News

                            Collapse

                            Topics Statistics Last Post
                            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
                            0 responses
                            31 views
                            0 reactions
                            Last Post SEQadmin2  
                            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
                            0 responses
                            39 views
                            0 reactions
                            Last Post SEQadmin2  
                            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-13-2026, 09:56 AM
                            0 responses
                            31 views
                            0 reactions
                            Last Post SEQadmin2  
                            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
                            0 responses
                            29 views
                            0 reactions
                            Last Post SEQadmin2  
                            Working...