Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • flobpf
    Member
    • Apr 2010
    • 76

    MUMmer's (probably) strange behavior

    Hi,

    I'm trying to use MUMmer to align two plant genomes - A. thaliana (120MB) and A. lyrata (240MB). The two species are fairly close - 5 million years - similar to humans and chimps.

    I used nucmer with the following command line to find alignment-blocks
    Code:
     nucmer -c 100 --prefix=ATref_ALquery AT.fasta AL.fasta
    Then, I parsed the delta file to reveal what percentage of each of the query scaffolds were covered on the reference genome. I was expecting to find a large percentage (maybe >70%) of each AL scaffold to map to one AT chromosome and the remaining 30% to be rearranged between various other chromosomes.

    However, what I find is for each AL scaffold, only 30-60% of the scaffold has any kind of alignment. For example, for the largest scaffold in A. lyrata, only 35.2% maps to Chromosome1 of A. thaliana, while another 3% maps to all other chromosomes (only 38% of the scaffold has any sort of alignment).

    Wonder if I'm doing something wrong or whether this is a standard observation for MUMmer runs? I'd appreciate any suggestions on how to improve the percentage of alignment.

    Thanks

    UPDATE: Just to be sure, I also performed an AT vs AT search and the results are as expected - 100% mapping of each AT chromosome.
    Last edited by flobpf; 04-23-2012, 05:53 AM.
  • seb567
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2008
    • 260

    #2
    Maybe there is an option to tell MUMmer to process both strands and you forgot it.

    Originally posted by flobpf View Post
    Hi,

    I'm trying to use MUMmer to align two plant genomes - A. thaliana (120MB) and A. lyrata (240MB). The two species are fairly close - 5 million years - similar to humans and chimps.

    I used nucmer with the following command line to find alignment-blocks
    Code:
     nucmer -c 100 --prefix=ATref_ALquery AT.fasta AL.fasta
    Then, I parsed the delta file to reveal what percentage of each of the query scaffolds were covered on the reference genome. I was expecting to find a large percentage (maybe >70%) of each AL scaffold to map to one AT chromosome and the remaining 30% to be rearranged between various other chromosomes.

    However, what I find is for each AL scaffold, only 30-60% of the scaffold has any kind of alignment. For example, for the largest scaffold in A. lyrata, only 35.2% maps to Chromosome1 of A. thaliana, while another 3% maps to all other chromosomes (only 38% of the scaffold has any sort of alignment).

    Wonder if I'm doing something wrong or whether this is a standard observation for MUMmer runs? I'd appreciate any suggestions on how to improve the percentage of alignment.

    Thanks

    UPDATE: Just to be sure, I also performed an AT vs AT search and the results are as expected - 100% mapping of each AT chromosome.

    Comment

    • Tong.W
      Member
      • Jul 2012
      • 14

      #3
      You need not set -c for 100,maybe it is too large.Or you may try to promer instead.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
        by SEQadmin2


        Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


        The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
        ...
        06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      37 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
      0 responses
      100 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
      0 responses
      121 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
      0 responses
      113 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...