Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • flobpf
    Member
    • Apr 2010
    • 76

    #1

    MUMmer's (probably) strange behavior

    Hi,

    I'm trying to use MUMmer to align two plant genomes - A. thaliana (120MB) and A. lyrata (240MB). The two species are fairly close - 5 million years - similar to humans and chimps.

    I used nucmer with the following command line to find alignment-blocks
    Code:
     nucmer -c 100 --prefix=ATref_ALquery AT.fasta AL.fasta
    Then, I parsed the delta file to reveal what percentage of each of the query scaffolds were covered on the reference genome. I was expecting to find a large percentage (maybe >70%) of each AL scaffold to map to one AT chromosome and the remaining 30% to be rearranged between various other chromosomes.

    However, what I find is for each AL scaffold, only 30-60% of the scaffold has any kind of alignment. For example, for the largest scaffold in A. lyrata, only 35.2% maps to Chromosome1 of A. thaliana, while another 3% maps to all other chromosomes (only 38% of the scaffold has any sort of alignment).

    Wonder if I'm doing something wrong or whether this is a standard observation for MUMmer runs? I'd appreciate any suggestions on how to improve the percentage of alignment.

    Thanks

    UPDATE: Just to be sure, I also performed an AT vs AT search and the results are as expected - 100% mapping of each AT chromosome.
    Last edited by flobpf; 04-23-2012, 05:53 AM.
  • seb567
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2008
    • 260

    #2
    Maybe there is an option to tell MUMmer to process both strands and you forgot it.

    Originally posted by flobpf View Post
    Hi,

    I'm trying to use MUMmer to align two plant genomes - A. thaliana (120MB) and A. lyrata (240MB). The two species are fairly close - 5 million years - similar to humans and chimps.

    I used nucmer with the following command line to find alignment-blocks
    Code:
     nucmer -c 100 --prefix=ATref_ALquery AT.fasta AL.fasta
    Then, I parsed the delta file to reveal what percentage of each of the query scaffolds were covered on the reference genome. I was expecting to find a large percentage (maybe >70%) of each AL scaffold to map to one AT chromosome and the remaining 30% to be rearranged between various other chromosomes.

    However, what I find is for each AL scaffold, only 30-60% of the scaffold has any kind of alignment. For example, for the largest scaffold in A. lyrata, only 35.2% maps to Chromosome1 of A. thaliana, while another 3% maps to all other chromosomes (only 38% of the scaffold has any sort of alignment).

    Wonder if I'm doing something wrong or whether this is a standard observation for MUMmer runs? I'd appreciate any suggestions on how to improve the percentage of alignment.

    Thanks

    UPDATE: Just to be sure, I also performed an AT vs AT search and the results are as expected - 100% mapping of each AT chromosome.

    Comment

    • Tong.W
      Member
      • Jul 2012
      • 14

      #3
      You need not set -c for 100,maybe it is too large.Or you may try to promer instead.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
        by SEQadmin2



        Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

        Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
        ...
        10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
        by SEQadmin2


        Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

        We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
        ...
        09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
      0 responses
      27 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
      0 responses
      20 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
      0 responses
      36 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
      0 responses
      43 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...