Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • flobpf
    Member
    • Apr 2010
    • 76

    MUMmer's (probably) strange behavior

    Hi,

    I'm trying to use MUMmer to align two plant genomes - A. thaliana (120MB) and A. lyrata (240MB). The two species are fairly close - 5 million years - similar to humans and chimps.

    I used nucmer with the following command line to find alignment-blocks
    Code:
     nucmer -c 100 --prefix=ATref_ALquery AT.fasta AL.fasta
    Then, I parsed the delta file to reveal what percentage of each of the query scaffolds were covered on the reference genome. I was expecting to find a large percentage (maybe >70%) of each AL scaffold to map to one AT chromosome and the remaining 30% to be rearranged between various other chromosomes.

    However, what I find is for each AL scaffold, only 30-60% of the scaffold has any kind of alignment. For example, for the largest scaffold in A. lyrata, only 35.2% maps to Chromosome1 of A. thaliana, while another 3% maps to all other chromosomes (only 38% of the scaffold has any sort of alignment).

    Wonder if I'm doing something wrong or whether this is a standard observation for MUMmer runs? I'd appreciate any suggestions on how to improve the percentage of alignment.

    Thanks

    UPDATE: Just to be sure, I also performed an AT vs AT search and the results are as expected - 100% mapping of each AT chromosome.
    Last edited by flobpf; 04-23-2012, 05:53 AM.
  • seb567
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2008
    • 260

    #2
    Maybe there is an option to tell MUMmer to process both strands and you forgot it.

    Originally posted by flobpf View Post
    Hi,

    I'm trying to use MUMmer to align two plant genomes - A. thaliana (120MB) and A. lyrata (240MB). The two species are fairly close - 5 million years - similar to humans and chimps.

    I used nucmer with the following command line to find alignment-blocks
    Code:
     nucmer -c 100 --prefix=ATref_ALquery AT.fasta AL.fasta
    Then, I parsed the delta file to reveal what percentage of each of the query scaffolds were covered on the reference genome. I was expecting to find a large percentage (maybe >70%) of each AL scaffold to map to one AT chromosome and the remaining 30% to be rearranged between various other chromosomes.

    However, what I find is for each AL scaffold, only 30-60% of the scaffold has any kind of alignment. For example, for the largest scaffold in A. lyrata, only 35.2% maps to Chromosome1 of A. thaliana, while another 3% maps to all other chromosomes (only 38% of the scaffold has any sort of alignment).

    Wonder if I'm doing something wrong or whether this is a standard observation for MUMmer runs? I'd appreciate any suggestions on how to improve the percentage of alignment.

    Thanks

    UPDATE: Just to be sure, I also performed an AT vs AT search and the results are as expected - 100% mapping of each AT chromosome.

    Comment

    • Tong.W
      Member
      • Jul 2012
      • 14

      #3
      You need not set -c for 100,maybe it is too large.Or you may try to promer instead.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
        by SEQadmin2



        Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
        ...
        07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
        by SEQadmin2



        Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

        There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
        07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
      0 responses
      25 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
      0 responses
      35 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
      0 responses
      22 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
      0 responses
      34 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...