Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Genomics101
    Member
    • May 2012
    • 60

    False negative variant calling in haploids. Call variants using coverage (not stats)?

    Greetings,

    I am looking for the simplest possible way to call variants computationally, just using position coverage and the ratio of reference/alternative allele, for divergent haploid genomes. I.e. no need for prior probability or a prediction based on an allele frequency spectrum. There is good coverage (average depth of coverage is 316X), and the sequences are 100bp reads of high-quality.

    I am mapping with BWA and using bcftools to call variants using Bayesian inference in "mpileup" files. It seems bcftools is just too fancy for this to work among these divergent haploid genomes, and I am getting only half the variants I should be, even setting the quality scores as low as 5 for filtering.

    Looking at my BAMs, the variants are there but are getting removed somehow, probably because they don't fit with some expected allele-frequency spectrum due to the level of divergence (~10-20 variants/kb)

    Is there a simple way, using bcftools, a script that goes into the pileup, or another program to get better calls? FreeBayes is recommended here for haploid genomes, and I'll look into it, but I think it may end-up with the same problem.

    Thanks!
    Last edited by Genomics101; 06-05-2012, 10:23 AM.
  • adaptivegenome
    Super Moderator
    • Nov 2009
    • 436

    #2
    I am assuming by variants you mean SNPs. FreeBayes is good. Also try JGIL.

    Comment

    • Genomics101
      Member
      • May 2012
      • 60

      #3
      SNPs and small indels, yes. I'm looking into FreeBayes now. I also ran the analysis on each BAM individually, rather than using a population sample, with bcftools, and the results were much better.

      Comment

      • BAMseek
        Senior Member
        • Apr 2011
        • 124

        #4
        Here is another seqanswers thread that might give some ideas if you haven't already seen it:



        If your looking for a simple way to call SNPs from the base frequencies, you might check out



        where they call something a homozygous SNP if the non-reference allele is >80% (after filtering on quality Q20 and coverage 20X). They called hets if the alternate allele was between 20-80% (which wouldn't be pertinent for you since you are dealing with haploids). This could at least serve as a base line sanity check.

        The IGV browser employs a similar heuristic to show variants:

        If a nucleotide differs from the reference sequence in greater than 20% of quality weighted reads, IGV colors the bar in proportion to the read count of each base
        Justin

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        7 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        11 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        19 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        53 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...