Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • waspboyz
    Junior Member
    • May 2012
    • 3

    #1

    Cufflinks non-model organism, issues with -b, and false concatenation of genes

    Hello,
    I have been working with the "tuxedo" package for a little while now, and have started getting the nice results that I want, but I still have a few nagging issues.

    One is that when I use the -b option, for multi-read correction in cuffdiff, I get a segmentation fault at differing stages of the run, and thus no result. If I do not use this option, I basically get no results, and the gene_exp.diff is basically full of NOTEST and LOWDATA entries.

    This is only an issue for the newest (and unfortunately much better) annotation and assembly, as when I run the package with the older files, it works generally fine (also with the -b option).

    Is there anything in the genome fasta or bowtie mapping files that I should look for in order to fix this problem? If anyone wants to take a look, I would be more than happy to send the files...

    Another issue I have is that at some point some clearly distinct genes are merged into one cufflinks transcript, so that in the gene_exp.diff file, an entry in the "gene" column would look like: Nasvi2EG000144,Nasvi2EG000145,Nasvi2EG000147,Nasvi2EG000149,Nasvi2EG000151 It is clear to me that I am losing quite some differential expression information due to this issue, and was wondering if there was a way to avoid it....
  • glados
    Member
    • Mar 2012
    • 59

    #2
    Are you using the 2.0.1 or 2.0.0 version? These issues are supposed to be fixed in that latest version. Another thing, -b is not multi-read-correction, it is frag-bias-correct.

    Comment

    • waspboyz
      Junior Member
      • May 2012
      • 3

      #3
      Originally posted by glados View Post
      Are you using the 2.0.1 or 2.0.0 version? These issues are supposed to be fixed in that latest version. Another thing, -b is not multi-read-correction, it is frag-bias-correct.
      This was in 2.0.1, as well as in earlier versions.
      Of course you are right about -b, I thought I had fixed it, but at least I got it right in the tags

      Comment

      • glados
        Member
        • Mar 2012
        • 59

        #4
        Ok. Then I don't know. Hopefully someone else do.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
          by SEQadmin2




          NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
          Today, 06:46 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
          by SEQadmin2



          Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

          Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
          ...
          10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
        0 responses
        22 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
        0 responses
        14 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
        0 responses
        67 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
        0 responses
        47 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...